If so, why the USA and the allies are not doing anything about it?
If not so, where the fresh bunch of terrorists is coming from?
Above question was asked by some guy a few hours before. After preparing my answer, I could not trace the question! However, about ten people had already expressed their opinion. I am now asking the same ques. on his/her behalf. Everybody should be able to put forward his concern. LET THE TRUTH COME OUT.
2006-09-14
06:31:07
·
15 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
News & Events
➔ Current Events
ahsan k, you are talking just like a jehadi recruiter. It is the duty of all muslims to bring others into Islam, right? And when someone shows his/her unwillingness, cut his/her throat, right? Congratulations! You are on right path. Keep it up. Mentality like this only will help you blow yourself up.
2006-09-14
07:14:09 ·
update #1
bajricf, conflicts in the society has existed ever since the beginning of civilizations. Likewise, mutual killings also happened. African tribal and other such violences were of inherently local nature. Ever heard of a tribal blowing himself up to kill tens, scores, thousands of innocent civilian population of another continent? I don't get how people like you actually abet and instigate terrorist activities by concealed appreciation. SHAME!
2006-09-14
08:58:50 ·
update #2
No, the madrassas are not the only source of incitement to violence. Go listen to a Jomeh kutba (Friday sermon) at any masjid. Go listen to the speeches at an iftar party after each day of fasting during Ramadan. You will hear the words of the Qur'an to remind all of their fard ayn (sacred duty).
Among Muslims there are those who:
a) jihad in the path of Allah with their wealth and their lives (including those who sit at home but give asylum to mujahidin 4:74) = true Muslim
b) those who sit at home (and do not give asylum to mujahidin or jihad in the path of Allah)
c) the handicapped (does not count as a category)
d) apostates (does not count as a category because they are not even considered to be Muslims and may even be killed like Sunni kill Shia)
In the Quran 4:95 it says:
The two are not equal: those who sit at home (and do not join the fighting) _ unless they have a reason; they are handicapped _ and those who [jihad] strive hard in the path of Allah with their wealth and lives. Over those who sit at home, Allah has excelled and elevated to a higher honor those who strive hard with their wealth and lives. Compared to those who sit at home, Allah will award a far greater reward to those who wage a struggle.
8:74 Those who believed, left their homes and waged a struggle for the cause of Allah as well as those who helped and protected them are really the true believers. There is forgiveness for them and a generous rewards.
49:15 The (true) believers are actually those who believe in Allah and His messenger and then do not waver (and do not entertain doubts). With their wealth and their lives, they strive for the sake of Allah. Such are truly the sincere ones
Yes, indeed, "Where are the moderate Muslims?"
Killing (qitl) and jihad in the cause of Allah is the hallmark of true Muslim believers. It is not a matter of moderate or fanatic. It is the distinction of a true believer or a rebel.
4:76 Those who believe, do fight for the sake of Allah, while those who reject faith (Islam) fight for the cause of ‘taghut’ _ (all rebellious forces aligned against Allah). So, fight against the minions of Shaitan. Feeble indeed is the wily guile of Shaitan!
Does this include atomic weapons?
8:60 Acquire and prepare all the (military) strength you can muster, including the finest trained horses (and other military wares). With that, you would daunt and deter the enemies of Allah _ your enemies, and others besides them. You do not know them, but Allah (surely) knows them. Anything you spend in the path of Allah will be returned to you in full. You will not be wronged (at all).
2:216 Warfare (for the sake of Allah) has been ordained for you, though it is not something you like. It is possible that the thing you detest might just (turn out to) be good for you. It is possible that the thing you like (the most) might in reality be bad for you. Allah knows (all) while you know nothing (at all)!
Yah, I know, there is no compulsion in religion (2:256) and Islam is a peaceful religion. Taqiyah.
The one page essay by Dr. Walid Phares, "Islamic concept of Al-Taqiyah to infiltrate and destroy kafir countries" explains how a convert will become a terrorist:
http://www.fisiusa.org/fisi_News_items/news109.htm
Phares states, "It [taqiyah] is done to prevent the new converts from seeing the real face of Islam; at least until their faith or mental conditioning is strong enough to make them turn against their own country and people."
Not all Muslims blow up things, yet "jihad in the cause of Allah" "jihad fee sybil Allah" is "fard ayn" "compulsory duty" for all Muslims. Why? There are rules from the Quran for combattive jihad. Read this:
http://www.notislam.com/id8.html
Islam is insidious, it encroaches on a culture slowly and deliberately. You may be interested to read a document which discusses the degrees of Islam in great detail (50+ pages) -- "From dawa to jihad - the various threats from radical Islam to the democratic legal order":
http://www.fas.org/irp/world/netherlands/dawa.pdf
.
2006-09-16 11:29:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
You have answered your own question: why the USA and the allies are not doing anything about it?
Just bcoz the whole idea is baseless.
The study by Christine Fair of the US Institute of Peace and Syed Rashid Bukhari, her Pakistan-based colleague, has found that the most robust estimates of the market share of madrassas suggest that less than one percent of all full-time enrolled students attend these institutions. There is also “scant evidence” that madrassas contribute substantially to the recruitment of militants, probably because militant organisations have their own quality standards and, given their relatively small recruitment missions, they likely have other options. “Similarly, most observers believe that only a very small number of madrassas are involved in the actual training of militants,
2006-09-18 08:39:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by farru 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
There have been other sources too. The slave trade And Apartheid regime bear testimony to the fact. Brutal murders of the black people by KU-KLUX-KLAN serve as an example of Christian terrorism. Dismemberment and murder of hundreds of innocent civilian people including women and children in Iraq and recent bombing of Lebanon by Israel were State terrorism.
However, the scope and intensity of Islamic terrorism is the most by far. Of course, producing the fresh bunch of terrorists is the raison d’ etre of Madrassas mushrooming everywhere. The civilised world HAS to do SOMETHING before it is TOO LATE.
2006-09-14 14:05:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by unicorn 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Definitely not. Timothy McVeigh was a domestic terrorist who was never in any madrassa. He probably never even gazed at the Koran. Eric Rudolph was an ultra-Christian. Terrorists come in all varieties.
2006-09-14 13:39:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by pvreditor 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I will not say so but they are definately the breeding ground for Jehadic mindset.There are thousands and thousands of them all along the border of INDIA and they are working overtime to soread the message of terrorosm. Yes, terrosism has nothing to do with POVERTY,ILLITERACY,UNEMPLOYMENT. Had it been so,why only Muslim guys are blowing themselves and the innocent people in the name of Jehad ? Problems are with every community.Not all of them are resorting to terrorism.Truth is even today's era, the Muslim youth likes to be led by FANATIC Muslim clergy who do not relate to the today's world.For them their religion is all that matters.And they are ready to kill anyone and everyone who is Non Believer. Problem lies there.
2006-09-14 13:56:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Among the religous institutions , the madrassas are the only sources of islamic terrorism.The disease started in pakis tan and spread around th world . It is ultimately pakistan that is responsible for the total damage of the image of the Islamic religon all oer the world . to day is is pretendenting to be fighting terrorism along with the US .It ia a the best joke of the 21st century.
Pakistans only intention was to train gorillas to fight the Inidans in kasmir to cause disenchantment in the minds of the akasmir Muslim population against Inidia with which they wnated to merge the state in the wake of its invasion by pakistan itself . The muslims who are said to be fighting for thefreeedom of th ekshmir stte sre not muslims of kashmir but the pakistniis and thier missionaries and coolies imported from the Gulf countries . That country run training schools under the managementof the ISI to interfere with the Kashmir and Afgahistan. since it was speciializing in the training of Muslim fundamentalist terrorists in the nam eof religon , it has become the mecca of terrorism for the muslim world and it was declared to be the sacred country for Muslims by Osama himself , the very same interenational terrorists it is pretending to search of while harbouring him safely in its soil to ensure that he is not caught by the Us. So it is pakistn that is responsible for the present pligh tof the Muslims all over the world. The world has come to realize this . It would be intelligent on the part of pakistan and others who believe in religous violence to change thier course of action in the interest of peace and redeeming the image of the religion.
Unfortunately this nefarious tactics of pakistani fundamentalists are goading groups of othere religous groups also take to violence in response to the violence .of Islamic trrorists . Pakistan should be stoped from making Islam synonimous with violence
2006-09-16 17:31:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Infinity 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Of Course not! What about the Israeli and mainstream Western media? What about the ICTY? And mentioning this institute of injustice, I appeal to all South Africans who read my comment, to contact me on creating a new political party, one of 2 main aims of which will be to bring Injustice Goldstone to justice, on the accounts of abduction (of Gen. Djukic and Col. Krsmanovic), murder (of Gen. Djukic) and incitement of hatered. The Second main aim of this party will be to grant amnesty to political prisoners who are in prison since 1993 or before. Thank you!
2006-09-14 13:41:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I may take a lot of flack for my point of view on this but, I really have no problem with fanatics killing each other. Makes my home just that much safer.
2006-09-14 15:54:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by exert-7 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Terrorism is not religion specific. The source is a mad rotten ,ugly, greedy, selfish mindset
2006-09-14 13:36:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by johan 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Any 1 who ask this question then ,did he knows that what ISLAM?
Islam is one and only religion it give us for our ALLAH(GOD) .
Muslim's belive only 1 ALLAH & his PROPHETs Hazrat ADAM S.W to
his last PROPHET MUHAMMAD (PEACE BE UPON HIM)
WHO BELIVE JUST 1 ALLAH his duty is that to perform his role &
brought new muslims in islam .& your enemies is whos that they dont do this work you Kill them
Ammerica & Jewish are the source of terrorim jewish always lier they had wanted to kill ALLAH'S PROPHET.
2006-09-14 13:50:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by Ahsan Khan 1
·
0⤊
0⤋