http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/09/12/usaf.weapons.ap/
2006-09-14 06:25:45 · 7 answers · asked by Fiesty Redhead 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
You mean before being used on innocent Non-Americans and Muslims?
The conservatives think so!
2006-09-14 06:29:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure. If I were going into combat I wouldn't want something non lethal. Now if the other guy wants to use non lethal weapons that is fine with me.
2006-09-14 06:39:35 · answer #2 · answered by namsaev 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In different aspects of the country risk-free practices forces could face their very own people, who're faulty. yet in Kashmir the forces could face the Pakistani brokers, and the Pakistani militants, who sneak into Kashmir for turning out to be concern. they could combat a conflict against the Pakistanis. Kashmiris are particularly straightforward people. they do no longer % any concern. those are the Pakistanis who create all the matters in Kashmir - sent by utilising ISI.
2016-11-07 07:55:42 · answer #3 · answered by lurette 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Go outside and be with the 3-d people. Stop wasting time on the computer. And sweety, 16 is very immature!!!
2006-09-14 07:29:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
As a former American soldier,i would never suggest that my men use non lethal anything.War is war,regardless if you like it or not.
2006-09-14 06:32:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Any government actor who suggests that is a traitor to his people.
2006-09-14 06:31:36 · answer #6 · answered by Paladin 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
go back to class and stop asking absurd questions
2006-09-14 06:35:38 · answer #7 · answered by Super Shiraz 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋