English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Let's say that I happened upon a liberal idiot rally held outside during the day. If I were able to comandeer a portable toilet cleaning truck with a full septic tank, drive it to the rally, kick on the pump and place it into reverse, thus spraying the crowd with the contents of the septic tank, would it be considered a felony?

2006-09-14 05:29:15 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

I must say, I've received some rather entertaining responses. You do all realize that this was nothing more than pure BS, don't you?

2006-09-14 08:48:59 · update #1

25 answers

Depending upon the total germ and virus count found after the analysis that would undoubtedly take place, and considering that people often have bloody noses and menstrual incidents and cut fingers (the offal of which is placed in toilets), I think that they would be likely to add up all the diseases and fungi and general funk and try to charge you separately for each assault of each disease etc. on each person. That's lawyers for you. Not that you wouldn't be asking for it. I don't much like liberals, either, but I'd rather debate out their idiocy in public legally to discredit them. Your solution may be an interesting, momentary flash of angry thought, but I certainly hope you never follow it through. By the way, I am seeking my J.D. right now........LOL

2006-09-14 05:55:01 · answer #1 · answered by annjalie 1 · 1 0

The report would read something like this:
Count 1) Auto theft ~ The truck
Count 2) Property Theft ~ The units equipment
Count 3) Simple Assault
Count 4) Assault with intend to do bodily harm
Count 5) Terroristic Threat ~ Using Bio Hazard Material as a weapon
Count 6) If you have a good Prosecutor on the case that recognizes that bodily fluid can carry the HIV virus and when introduced into peoples eyes and mouths can pass the HIV virus; Attempted manslaughter.
Count 7) Driving without a brain
Count 8) Operating a HazMat vehicle without the proper indorsements.

Lets do the math shall we?
That is 4 class b and c felonies
And 4 small offenses

By the time you plea bargained, because I am sure you would not want to accept full responsibility for this ill fated plan, you would do at least 5 years in the Federal joint, and maybe 3 years county time, before they got you run through the system to get you to the federal joint.

I think you should go for it.
I don't think its going to work though, it is after all a crappy plan!

2006-09-14 12:47:01 · answer #2 · answered by GoneByDawn 4 · 0 0

Well since there are chemicals in them and not just fecal matter and urine, not only would you ASSAULT (felony1) them with that, the chemical in some on them can actually eat skin so you would be guilty of maiming all those people too (felon 2)
Grand theft auto (felony3)
Operating a truck without a license(misto 1)
Inciting a riot (felony 4)( That is also a Federal crime.
And I'm sure several other local laws about where the truck is, and unlawful protest.
So add those up and add a few more that I didn't think of.

A FELONY.............no.
Many crimes and acting like a total moron.........YES.

2006-09-14 12:42:18 · answer #3 · answered by HEATHER 4 · 0 0

Yes,Oui,Da, Jawohl, any chance you didn't get it, idiot.
I love morons who if asked will claim to be fighting for the USA and all that it stands for and then will turn around and attack the basic core values the USA was set up to represent.You spiritual brothers are cowering in a cave in Afghanistan. Your attacks are on the same things and for much the same reason you just disagree about how to talk to God.

2006-09-14 12:32:49 · answer #4 · answered by ? 5 · 0 1

Yes

2006-09-14 12:37:22 · answer #5 · answered by campojoe 4 · 0 0

All depends were you are and how the pigs and the good for nothing judges are ..... you might catch a little charge if anything .Now if you "steal " the truck then say thats theft brother ... But GOOD WORK !!!!

2006-09-15 10:50:49 · answer #6 · answered by we_dgaf_420 1 · 0 0

It could be viewed as assault with a deadly weapon depending on how they wanted to prosecute it, which they probably would do because that would no doubt be a major media case

2006-09-14 12:32:25 · answer #7 · answered by cynthetiq 6 · 0 0

It could be... depending on the load you are spraying, it would probably be contaminated with bacteria that would be an extreme health hazard.

I would think you could be charged with assult or attempted murder by contaminating people.

2006-09-14 12:32:53 · answer #8 · answered by j H 6 · 0 0

It would be assault at the very least....Here is what I found out...13-1204. Aggravated assault; classification; definition

A. A person commits aggravated assault if the person commits assault as defined in section 13-1203 under any of the following circumstances:

1. If the person causes serious physical injury to another.

2. If the person uses a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument.

3. If the person commits the assault after entering the private home of another with the intent to commit the assault.

4. If the person is eighteen years of age or older and commits the assault upon a child the age of fifteen years or under.

5. If the person commits the assault knowing or having reason to know that the victim is a peace officer, or a person summoned and directed by the officer while engaged in the execution of any official duties.

6. If the person knowingly takes or attempts to exercise control over a peace officer's or other officer's firearm and the person knows or has reason to know that the victim is a peace officer or other officer employed by one of the agencies listed in paragraph 10, subdivision (a), item (i), (ii), (iii), (iv) or (v) of this subsection and is engaged in the execution of any official duties.

7. If the person knowingly takes or attempts to exercise control over any weapon other than a firearm that is being used by a peace officer or other officer or that the officer is attempting to use, and the person knows or has reason to know that the victim is a peace officer or other officer employed by one of the agencies listed in paragraph 10, subdivision (a), item (i), (ii), (iii), (iv) or (v) of this subsection and is engaged in the execution of any official duties.

8. If the person knowingly takes or attempts to exercise control over any implement that is being used by a peace officer or other officer or that the officer is attempting to use, and the person knows or has reason to know that the victim is a peace officer or other officer employed by one of the agencies listed in paragraph 10, subdivision (a), item (i), (ii), (iii), (iv) or (v) of this subsection and is engaged in the execution of any official duties. For the purposes of this paragraph, "implement" means an object that is designed for or that is capable of restraining or injuring an individual. Implement does not include handcuffs.

9. If the person commits the assault knowing or having reason to know the victim is a teacher or other person employed by any school and the teacher or other employee is upon the grounds of a school or grounds adjacent to the school or is in any part of a building or vehicle used for school purposes, any teacher or school nurse visiting a private home in the course of the teacher's or nurse's professional duties or any teacher engaged in any authorized and organized classroom activity held on other than school grounds.

10. If the person meets both of the following conditions:

(a) Is imprisoned or otherwise subject to the custody of any of the following:

(i) The state department of corrections.

(ii) The department of juvenile corrections.

(iii) A law enforcement agency.

(iv) A county or city jail or an adult or juvenile detention facility of a city or county.

(v) Any other entity that is contracting with the state department of corrections, the department of juvenile corrections, a law enforcement agency, another state, any private correctional facility, a county, a city or the federal bureau of prisons or other federal agency that has responsibility for sentenced or unsentenced prisoners.

(b) Commits an assault knowing or having reason to know that the victim is acting in an official capacity as an employee of any of the entities prescribed by subdivision (a) of this paragraph.

11. If the person commits the assault while the victim is bound or otherwise physically restrained or while the victim's capacity to resist is substantially impaired.

12. If the person commits the assault knowing or having reason to know that the victim is a fire fighter, fire investigator, fire inspector, emergency medical technician or paramedic engaged in the execution of any official duties, or a person summoned and directed by such individual while engaged in the execution of any official duties.

13. If the person commits the assault knowing or having reason to know that the victim is a licensed health care practitioner who is certified or licensed pursuant to title 32, chapter 13, 15, 17 or 25, or a person summoned and directed by the licensed health care practitioner while engaged in the person's professional duties. The provisions of this paragraph do not apply if the person who commits the assault is seriously mentally ill, as defined in section 36-550, or is afflicted with Alzheimer's disease or related dementia.

14. If the person commits assault by any means of force which causes temporary but substantial disfigurement, temporary but substantial loss or impairment of any body organ or part or a fracture of any body part.

15. If the person commits assault as prescribed by section 13-1203, subsection A, paragraph 1 or 3 and the person is in violation of an order of protection issued against the person pursuant to section 13-3602 or 13-3624.

16. If the person commits the assault knowing or having reason to know that the victim is a prosecutor.

B. Except pursuant to subsections C and D of this section, aggravated assault pursuant to subsection A, paragraph 1, 2 or 6 of this section is a class 3 felony except if the victim is under fifteen years of age in which case it is a class 2 felony punishable pursuant to section 13-604.01. Aggravated assault pursuant to subsection A, paragraph 14 of this section is a class 4 felony. Aggravated assault pursuant to subsection A, paragraph 7 or 10 of this section is a class 5 felony. Aggravated assault pursuant to subsection A, paragraph 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15 or 16 of this section is a class 6 felony.

C. Aggravated assault pursuant to subsection A, paragraph 1 or 2 of this section committed on a peace officer while the officer is engaged in the execution of any official duties is a class 2 felony. Aggravated assault pursuant to subsection A, paragraph 14 of this section committed on a peace officer while the officer is engaged in the execution of any official duties is a class 3 felony. Aggravated assault pursuant to subsection A, paragraph 5 of this section resulting in any physical injury to a peace officer while the officer is engaged in the execution of any official duties is a class 5 felony.

D. Aggravated assault pursuant to:

1. Subsection A, paragraph 1 or 2 of this section is a class 2 felony if committed on a prosecutor.

2. Subsection A, paragraph 14 of this section is a class 3 felony if committed on a prosecutor.

3. Subsection A, paragraph 16 of this section is a class 5 felony if the assault results in a physical injury to a prosecutor.

E. For the purposes of this section, "prosecutor" means a county attorney, a municipal prosecutor or the attorney general and includes an assistant or deputy county attorney, municipal prosecutor or attorney general.
I hope this answers your question...Blessed Be~

2006-09-14 12:42:53 · answer #9 · answered by Cheppyyyyy 2 · 0 0

Idiotic.

2006-09-14 12:31:27 · answer #10 · answered by jb 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers