What if the Battle Lines in the War on Terror (if it could still be called this) were clear cut???

Question

As in all (or a majority of) Muslims and their apologetics finally come out and say "We Support Osama and Hamas and Ahmedjinad!!! Death to the USA, Israel, Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism and the West!!!" And we affected Non-Muslims finally say "We've had enough and we'll fight you to the end!!!" (not necessarily rally around Bush or whatever figure or nation, just unite under common interest of survival against Osama's aggression) If the world was divided finally into two clear sides...would this war be easier to fight instead of picking through the fog of grayness, denials, political correctness and double standards (from both sides) to find and confront our enemies???

(remember folks this is "what if?" time...no intent to slander meant for Muslims who obviously do not like Osama and his goals.)

Answer 1

That is quite a what if. For one thing Muslims would have to accept Osama. Not likely, stripped of his Saudi citizenship, asked to leave the Sudan, and not welcomed by other Arab states, he is a man without a country and since 9-11 a price on his head. His radical Islam is rejected by even[maybe more especially] fundamental Islamics. Osama and his band of operatives are not a group any Arab state wants to be aligned with. Hamas is aligned with Palestinians, and they have been demostrating to their government voicing their demands, that's Democracy! We can only hope Muslims don't come out and say the support Osama and Hamas in the same breath.

Answer 2

Perhaps it is that hard line approach that has us in the mess we are in today...this idea that only one ideology can be victorious or exist at the cost of the other...but I'll play your what-if game....

Well! That approach might work but to what end? Is there really any point in fighting for a patch of dirt if there are no people left to live on it?

Also, don't our liberal ideals of democracy accept that many schools of thought/ideology can co-exist? In fact, hate speach while a crime if it incites a violent act is also protected as free speech in our society.

To cut through the fog of war we must cut through the gaucho politics......stop playing the blame game and "the whose gun is bigger" game and start listening........

Answer 3

I continually think of that's amazingly ironic and bewildering while Christians confess they're professional-loss of life Penalty. I recommend...Jesus became tortured and accomplished on a trumped up cost of sedition and treason. Even the Roman government observed that he hadn't harm or killed all people or stolen something, so he became the main in call for case of an harmless individual getting the loss of life Penalty if ever there became one. The Gospels look to me to point out greater advantageous than something why we ought to continually not have the loss of life Penalty. i'm professional-determination on abortion (women persons ought to have the skill to declare what occurs to their very own bodies and something starting to be interior them...i understand i might call for the ultimate to hit upon a thank you to abort if I have been a girl. and that i'm anti-loss of life penalty, via fact: a million. Killing human beings ends their punishment, and that i assumed we would have cherished to punish them for a protracted time. 2. It does not in any way shape or kind deter murderers from committing homicide 3. They finally end up sitting on loss of life Row for some years besides. 4. If new information surfaces that exonerates them, you won't be in a position to ultimate the errors if their ineffective. 5. It does not deliver the murdered back, and it sends a contradictory message to society. Thou shalt not kill...different than while that is performed as a punishment. 6. God and Jesus the two reported Thou Shalt not Kill, not..."each and every now and returned that is okay to kill."

Answer 4

Maybe they could use biological weapons against them so they would all die and leave their resources intact for americans to go and bring back to their country.