And be portrayed next to other REAL & EXCELLENT presidents from the past?
2006-09-14 04:15:23 · 33 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
yes they should add him to Mt Rushmore along with John Kennedy
2006-09-14 04:18:18 · answer #1 · answered by orygunduk1 2 · 4⤊ 7⤋
Of course he should be. During the administration of William Jefferson Clinton, the U.S. enjoyed more peace and economic well being than at any time in its history. He was the first Democratic president since Franklin D. Roosevelt to win
a second term. He could point to the lowest unemployment rate in modern times, the lowest inflation in 30 years, the highest home ownership in the country's history, dropping crime rates in many places, and reduced welfare roles. He proposed the first balanced budget in decades and achieved a budget surplus. As part of a plan to celebrate the millennium in 2000, Clinton called for a great national initiative to end racial discrimination.
And Dubya's face should be added to the made in China toilet paper.
2006-09-14 05:08:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, he should be right up there with the really excellent presidents, but I think they should re-shape Thomas Jefferson's head into a Bill Clinton head, since Thomas Jefferson being up there is supposed to represent government by and for the people and that no longer exists anyway.
Viva Billy-Boy!
2006-09-15 00:30:31 · answer #3 · answered by Candidus 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mount Rushmore shouldn't be touched. Not to add Clinton, or Reagan, or (God forbid) Bush 43. If someone decides in the future to build a monument to one of these or other presidents then build a new one.
2006-09-14 04:51:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No I think Mount Rushmore is fine the way it is. It portrays real American Presidents that formed this country into the power it is today. Clinton just proved that a president can say whatever he or she wants if you talk real fast. Oh and getting sex in the oval office, cheating on your wife, and lying to the American public on TV is also something we can all look forward to.
2006-09-14 04:19:42 · answer #5 · answered by Mark S 3 · 6⤊ 1⤋
Whether he should or shouldn't be added is a moot question. They won't be adding anyone to Mt. Rushmore because the surrounding stone wouldn't be able to withstand it.
2006-09-14 05:33:24 · answer #6 · answered by jersey girl 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No
This one
http://images.scotsman.com/2005/08/03/0308fahdb.jpg
2006-09-14 04:45:49 · answer #7 · answered by 43 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
NO, the men on Mt. Rushmore were not cowards like Clinton, they were not afraid to fight for their country and the rights and freedoms it allows.
NO, Clinton is not even worth of having his/her picture on toilet paper.... I don't want scum like that anywhere near decent people.
2006-09-14 04:25:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Frankly no one deserves it more than Pres Clin. in the last 40 years. Hopefully if we can keep the Republicans out of the \Wite House for another 40 years we can really get the campaign going.
He truly united the races in the country, apart from the usual racist rednecks who don't actually want to see color amongst us.
2006-09-14 04:50:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
yes, but on Mt. Rushmore it should be an image of his penis since that was the only thing he really used while in office.
2006-09-14 04:19:35 · answer #10 · answered by Coz 3 · 6⤊ 2⤋
only if i got a plaque and mount it to my toilet and call that mt. rushmore..so i can p*ss all over it
2006-09-14 04:43:37 · answer #11 · answered by Michael D 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋