E - NONE of the above.
The government is not here to steal money from childless couples to give it to people who don't understand how birth control works.
Seriously, the federal government is set up for national defense and to regulate interstate commerce. EVERY other thing they do is stepping beyond their authority. If you can't afford your children, budget yourself differently. Don't ask the government to steal my money to give it to you so you can maintain your lifestyle.
2006-09-14 04:13:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by FozzieBear 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Those are all pretty good benefits but if I had to pick one I would say child allowances or universal health care. Why because th emoney could provide a better life for families but then it could encourage an dabundance of kids and that would suck for everyone.... the universal health care is a good on ebecause they need to be healthy in order to develop an deventually become a functioning part of society.
2006-09-14 04:16:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by jlauren0923 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
This relatively isn't a "lib" vs "con" argument. Its approximately what we intend to do with our collective supplies. well-being care that has been mandated by utilising regulation to be for each guy or woman has the unlucky function of being a drain on supplies. something it is "unfastened" gets used plenty better than if people could pay for it. (this additionally applies to the well-being care supplied to unlawful extraterrestrial beings!) The well-being care marketplace basically won't be able to have sufficient funds it, what we % is an overhaul of the "CAPITALISTIC" sort of society. The chinese language traded in Socialism for Capitalism and with huge expenses in human misery. There should be a healthful discipline ... well-being care can no longer proceed to grant for unlawful extraterrestrial beings and such. good fences make for good friends! we are able to no longer have sufficient funds to grant "limitless care" to those that could be hypochondriacs or some such. The gadget will finally end up rationing centers and that's going to be a multitude any way you paintings it!
2016-11-07 07:44:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
E NONE The Government doesnt give you anything, they take from tax payers and give to non tax payers.
I say provide for yourself. It's not my responsibility to raise your kids or look after your health. Plan.
Also I lived under universal health care, pick a number and wait.
The taxes we would have to pay would blow your mind away.
You cannot even imagine what you will pay, and what you dont get.
2006-09-14 14:29:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Rick D 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
None of them.
Tax credits are already given for children and child care. Universal Health Care is too expensive.
Maybe you should do a little research of your own first.
2006-09-14 04:15:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
e. - none of the above.
Name one government program that hasn't currupt into a money pit with little to no positive result?
All of the above would be wonderful. Just don't let a govenment run them.
2006-09-14 04:15:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by jb_cpq 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Why should the government provide any of these benefits? Did they get you pregnant? Don't you get vacation and leave for childbirth? I think perhaps another form of government would be more to your liking. Europe has many that will fit your needs. buh bye
2006-09-14 04:15:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
The government doesnt care about American families all they care about is Iraq and terrorism.
2006-09-14 04:13:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by . 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
None. People should provide for their own care.
2006-09-14 04:21:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by SPLATT 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Okay, no problem with any of the above...but who pays for all of this??
2006-09-14 05:00:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by fairly smart 7
·
0⤊
1⤋