English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

AND NOT ONLY DO WE HAVE ENOUGH TO WIPE OUT THE ENTIRE PLANET , BUT WE ARE THE "O N L Y " COUNTRY EVER TO USE NUCLEAR WEAPONS!???!?!? HOW DO WE JUSTIFY OWER POSSITION WITHOUT LOOKING LIKE /AND ACTING LIKE WE ARE BETTER AND MORE IMPORTANT THAN ANYONE ELSE!?!?!?

2006-09-14 04:11:24 · 20 answers · asked by ong jon 6 in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

ATTENTION EVRYONE: so far 14 responces [ thank you all] and i respect and understand ALL your sentiments... but none address the question as it is asked.. let me rephrase: how would you tell [lets say north korea] its ok for the the usa [ and its friends to have weapond[ by the way , pointed at YOU] but you can not..? you are our chif negotiator ... how do you convince them ? the one who convinces me gets the points.

2006-09-14 04:27:00 · update #1

"ck" the ONLY thing that has been proven [ not that i'm looking for proof]is that the usa will use them!

2006-09-14 04:29:39 · update #2

hey "bobby" in case you didnt notice we invade iraqu because we "thought " lol they may have wmds lol... i think plenty of countries including our friends have question about our sanity!

2006-09-14 04:39:23 · update #3

.. again "bobby" has GOD blessed this country?.. do you think most americans wake up each mornig and think of GOD or how they will serve God today , or how much money thay can make today ????

2006-09-14 04:43:16 · update #4

AGAIN "bobby" i know all about ww2.. and maybe because we are the only ones to use atomic wepons we SHOULD be the ones to lead the way to disarmament... BUT HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN THIS TO THE REST OF THE WORLD WHEN OVER THE PASSED 50 YEARS NOBODY HAS INVADED MORE COUNTRIES THAN THE USA[ whether we were right or wrong in doing so ]???how do YOU convince the rest of the world its ok for us but not for you ? what do you say to them!?

2006-09-14 04:50:00 · update #5

A G A I N "BOB" .. thanks for "enlighting" me young man... but maybe you should try a little reading comprehension and try answering the question as it is asked!

2006-09-14 04:54:00 · update #6

;..and once again"bob" it was not an "unprovoced attack"... it was certainly a "sneak attack "..but not unprovoced.. we had the oil supply of japan cut off.. and that pi&&ed them off..

2006-09-14 09:23:53 · update #7

20 answers

WE CANNOT JUSTIFY OUR POSITION, IN ANY WAY, SHAPE OR FORM.......really shameful

2006-09-20 13:08:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

well for one thing, it's not all other countries. There are other countries that do have nuclear weapons; Israel, russia, great britain to name 3. yes we do have enough to wppe out the entire planet if that was in our nature. But the U.S. is not a rogue country. our nature is one that helps other countries. If there is a catastrophe anywhere in the world you can look for the good ole u s of a to come to the rescue.

that is one reason we are a blessed country, because of our generosity and the fact that our nation was founded on biblical principles. God has truly blessed this nation. that is one reason that the USA has more advanced technology than any other country and is the youngest country. we are the youngest nation but far exceed any other country in weaponry and technology.

At the tine the A-Bomb was used, not the nuclear bomb, Japan
was trying to conquer the world; they bombed Pearl Harbor.

that attack was unprovoked. In the course of time, we got them back by dropping the A-Bomb on Nagasaki and Hiroshima and that brought World War 2 to an end. This really saved a lot of lives that would have been lost had the war drug on. Hope this has enlightened you somewhat.

2006-09-14 11:33:17 · answer #2 · answered by bobbie a 1 · 1 1

Because while haveing nuclear capabilities we have (so far) had the descresion of when to use them and not to use them. In the instance of the bombing of Japan we used the bombs to decisivly end the war. A ground invasion of Japan would have killed many more people on both sides than the two bombs did. As for the other countries we ask not to have nuclear weapons because they have unstable governments and/or they are commited to the destruction of another country. There are several other countries that have nuclear weapons that keep us in check, but there is no check for someone willing to kill themselves and others for their cause. Finally we secure our nuclear weapons and keep them and the technology from being bought and sold on the black market. This cannot be ensured in other less stable nations.

2006-09-14 11:21:57 · answer #3 · answered by MaL 2 · 0 1

We can't justify our posistion without acting superior, but since when has arrogance been an obstacle for America?
Let's look at a metaphor. Who would you trust with a pistol, the only person in the group to ever have fired one, the people who have had one for years without feeling the need to fire it, or the guys who want their own becasue other people have them?

2006-09-14 11:15:47 · answer #4 · answered by juicy_wishun 6 · 1 0

I guess it comes down to the case where we feel we would use these weapons responsibly, where as other countries may not use them in a responsible manner. Do you think terrorist organizations would hesitate to use Nukes if they had them. I guess it is sort of like giving a handgun to a child, where as the u.s. is trained in using a handgun, and responsible.

2006-09-14 11:14:44 · answer #5 · answered by Pat 2 · 1 0

We worry that less stable nations, with radical governments will use nuclear weapons without all the safeguards and back up systems we, and other responsible nations have in place. That may not be true, but that is what we think.

2006-09-14 11:14:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

because that particular country has the VERY HIGH potential to be the next BIG KILLER...!! This has been "Proven" even from the speech with intention to 'delete' another country out of the world map!! If this happened, it will be too late for others to react!!

If this could be happen to that particular country, it would be happen to another country or countries as well...!!

2006-09-14 11:19:14 · answer #7 · answered by CK 3 · 0 1

It is totally unfair, right? Maybe America wants to have monopoly in using and providing nuclear energy to others!

2006-09-14 11:14:37 · answer #8 · answered by Sami V 7 · 0 1

We can't. Nobody ever said anything was suppose to be fair. Why do the Saudi's have all that oil and won't let us have it except for a fee?

It's just as scary to have Bush with his finger on the button, in my opinion, as any mental patient (myself included). So, it's not a fair system. Everybody just uses power as a pretext for being fair as a pretext for maintaining power.

2006-09-14 11:14:07 · answer #9 · answered by overseas and broke 2 · 0 3

Because we have them and pledge not to use them.

Do you think Iran would not use them on Israel the first chance they get?

The President of Iran is wanting to Kill ALL of Israel, even though he knows that Iran will then be wiped off the map as well.

But he does not care if his countrymen will all be martyrs.

I wonder where he will be? maybe visiting another country?

Peace!

2006-09-14 11:14:54 · answer #10 · answered by C 7 · 0 2

Tell you what. Why don't we just give the radical nations all the nucular toys thay want from our stockpile and just let them send them back to us armed. Would you like that?? well would you!!!

2006-09-14 11:17:57 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers