Should the USA hold direct talks with Iran?

Question

The President of Iran doesn't like America. BUT, he has talked about wanting to meet President Bush.

After 27 years, don't you think it's time to break the ice, and begin a dialogue with Iran.

I think it is time. We have nothing to lose, and a lot to gain.

Peace was never achieved by only talking to your allies.

Answer 1

I think it would be an excellent idea. When not talking, then we would have to consider alternatives. What would those alternatives look like? War?

Well, i think this country has its hands full with the war in Iraq and we cannot continue to expect others to fight our wars. Israel is at the center of the fighting in the middle east. Hast anyone considered that Israel might be the real terrorist in the middle east and that all other players in that theater are the good ones?

So yes, direct talks should be established with Iran; inasmuch direct talks with North Korea should be established. We have seen that six years of narrow minded crowbar diplomacy has led to nothing but failure. It is time for a change in attitude in the Bush junta.

Answer 2

I think dialogue with a country you are intending to invade either directly or using Israel as a tool is very important. I also think that the reason we are refusing to speak with their country's representatives is because we do not want to put a human face on the real act of terror we are planning. Just look at Iraq. When do we see the real terror we are imposing on those poor people? Not in mainstream media anyway. There is no threat from Iran except for the one our government has fictitiously created in order to further their attempt to control the middle east.

Answer 3

decrease than Bush we've legitimized the belief of preemptive war. the challenge with preemptive war is that interior the terrific prognosis no rely the way you spin it the guy who forged the 1st stone became nevertheless the aggressor. We anticipate that if Iran has a nuclear weapon then they are going to smash Israel or us interior of moments of its operational readiness. Thats not an exceedingly probable assumption. At this 2d North Korea, an avowed enemy, individual who has overtly stated they are going to use any ability accessible to smash us for the final 50 years, has the tactical skill to launch a nuclear warhead unto American soil. yet they have not. Why do you think of it is genuine? the united statesS.R while it existed had the tactical skill to absolutely smash united statesa. with a nuclear bombardment yet they did not. Why? Self renovation is why. particular. that's genuine that the greater nukes exist the greater advantageous the possibility of a few insane individual making use of them, thats a risk we've lived via fact the top of international conflict 2. that's a severe and important risk yet does it justify a conflict now? Why hasn't it justified a conflict for the final 60 years? do not enable the rhetoric sway you into concern. we live in a unfavorable international yet what makes us worth of the appellation international skill is that we temper our skill with accountability and we don't respond to each danger with overwhelming rigidity. The Bush doctrine became a bad doctrine and we ought to desert it. Iran is a danger yet so are many different international locations. We handle threats by ability of defusing them and not putting them off. we've the skill to weigh down Iran's nuclear targets yet not the justification. interior the terrific prognosis they have not fired on us so if we hearth on them then we are the aggressor they declare we are and we justify their nuclear software with our strikes. they are going to finally end up the sufferer of an aggressive and violent u . s . a . interior the eyes of the international. And the international remains greater advantageous than we are. extra: we are in a position to call it something we adore yet as quickly as we intentionally launch missiles into someones u . s . a . and kill their electorate they have each and every appropriate to call it conflict. we would possibly not evaluate it conflict yet I doubt that they are going to see it that way.

Answer 4

Really?
You think it is time we sat down to talk to a man who was one of the terrorists that held Americans hostage for 400 days?
You think it is a good idea to talk to a man who says that he wants to completely destroy a sovereign country in the Middle East region, while working on nuclear weaponry?
You think it would be nice to talk to a country where Christians and Jews have to where red and yellow stripes on their clothes, so everyone knows what confession they belong to?
You think we should talk to Hitler and try to talk sense into him?

Answer 5

my a$$ you have a lot to gain... the reason why the US is harassing iran is because the later opened an oil bourse in euros. and you can be sure that they'll make more money, so why with the other OPEC countries keep selling its oil in dollars? they wouldn't. your economy would hit the ground so fast you wouldn't have time for another big mac

Answer 6

yeah its time to talk . the president of Iran likes American people but not American government just like people all over the world

Answer 7

Yes, we should tell them that if they proceed with the Uranium enrichment we are going to do some nuclear tests or our own. In Iran!!!!

Answer 8

Hold talks with a terrorist supporter? U got to be kidding me, man.

Answer 9

Yes, you're right.