2006-09-14 00:20:45 · 6 answers · asked by Thomas V 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I was asking as royalty and religion are usually so closely intertwined - the British monarch being head of The Church of England for example - that being a monarchist and a non-believer seem wholy incompatible.
2006-09-14 00:26:13 · update #1
Oh yes!
Me
Head of the Church of England and Defender of the Faith are just like bits of a Job Description really
2006-09-14 00:22:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
My position on the social scale prohibits me from "rubbing elbows" with the aristocratic ilk of the world but my common sense allows me to surmise that there are kooks at every level of the social ladder and that there are in fact some pro-royal athiests.
2006-09-14 00:30:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Surley the Queen is at least half-divine - like Tutankhamun and the Emperor Caligula - so this cannot be possible?
2006-09-14 00:23:30 · answer #3 · answered by helmut cheez 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yup, I'm one of 'em. Who needs religion, it does more harm than good.
2006-09-14 02:15:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i am sure there are... or wait... no there cant be.:)
because ALL royalty derives their right to rule us from gods will, right?
so, denying gods existence, is also denying royalty.
there. riddle solved... where is my cookie?
2006-09-14 00:27:25 · answer #5 · answered by wolschou 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why?
2006-09-14 00:22:38 · answer #6 · answered by Rudebox77 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋