Relative to what. But no I don't think it was long.
You must be the only person in the country without their own copy of "Dirty Dancing". Poor deprived thing.
2006-09-13 23:03:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Yellowstonedogs 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
No, he had long hair in a film called Next of kin i think
2006-09-13 22:57:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by chickadee 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
He Kinda', Sorta', got it "just right"-His hair was not long enough to be called "long-hair", AND, his hair was not short enough to call if"short hair." Either way with this answer nobody wins the argument, and nobody loses the argument!
2006-09-13 23:07:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Just passed the ears and swept back with a quiff to boot.
2006-09-13 22:57:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mullet
2006-09-16 09:59:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by janssen411 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
No are you crazy, he clearly had short hair in all of his films a mullet style!
2006-09-16 10:37:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sky 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
short
2006-09-16 05:09:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by adelahaggan 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
As i recall had a long mullet type haircut and a big quiff at the front
2006-09-13 23:07:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by sam 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Not really. I have just looked at the image gallery for the movie (below) and he looks normal length
2006-09-13 23:00:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Short! Kind of like a mullet.
2006-09-13 22:58:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by bookluffer 3
·
1⤊
0⤋