2006-09-13 22:50:50 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
there is no reason why a dialogue should be refused....diplomacy is always better than war.....you only refuse dialogue when you dont want to face the facts.
2006-09-13 22:55:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
First of all it is not a "nuclear" problem as the Iranian president suggests, but a "nuclear weapons" problem....the Iranian goal of producing nuclear weapons grade uranium and eventually plutonium.
It is not very conceivable that an oil rich nation would want or need to expend so much $$$ on developing or construction such massive infrastructure for the development of electrical power plants.
Also the Iranian president has continually used every tactic to stall and delay efforts to resolve this issue and continue his countries' development to build nukes.
Finally, the US has had a long standing policy to not deal with terrorists and any further discussion will be of little, if any value. Besides....why hasn't Iran allowed the international inspection ny the IAEA since when....August 23, 2006?
Desire for nuclear power my A**!!
By the way people, none of us are perfecte but we can at least try a little harder.
**godisdead - what the heck does the word anialte mean? It's not in my dictionary. Could you have meant the word; "annihilate"? Try buying a $15.00 dictionary.
**messagef..- you want Bush to use diplomacy? Read my answer again. Didy ou miss the part where the president of iran was one of the so-called students (terrorists) that violated international law when they took over the US Embassey in 1979 and held US citizen for 444 days? This guy is no doubt big on diplomacy...right? Read some history beore you pontificate about diplomacy.
**muzyne - 1st, learn some basic grammar. I read some of your other Q&A's. What does "alggeeeeda" mean? Is that some terrorist code you use?
**zulu1 - It is not President Bushs' army; it is the Army of the USA. I know because I served in the US Army. Which branch of the service did you serve in?
2006-09-14 06:57:01 · answer #2 · answered by iraq51 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you are looking for a bush bashing answer I can't give you one. If you want the truth it would be a waste of time. The president and the u.n. told the dictator to stop with the nuclear reactors before they would talk. He refuses to halt their work. Even during the talks. Also if you go back and watch some of the conversations the man had with news reporters he is a great one on avoiding answers. It's just a ploy to stall for more time and to try to make himself look good in Iran.
Since Iran is all run by government media all the people would see is a cut off version of the talks. Which would have a negative impact with it's people against the united states. The people of Iran are getting to the point of over throwing their country. This would give him more leverage.and make him look like a hero to his people.
2006-09-14 06:06:10 · answer #3 · answered by Stand 4 somthing Please! 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Iran is totally clean. Any honest talk will have successful results. But Bush and the people above him do not want a positive resolution to Iran's nuclear problems. I'll tell you why. 1st - Iran is a threat to Israel's existence. 2nd - Iran is an oil-producing country. 3rd - successful peace talks will render the Bush government unable to justify another geopolitical war in the region that will benefit not just Israel, but also energy companies and military companies (companies manufacturing and selling military products). Of course you don't think Bush will be so stupid as to tell the media "I don't wanna because it will deplete me of my military and political might to make more money in the future by waging continuous war. And I don't wanna because my Israeli friends that have supported me for so long will be disappointed."
2006-09-14 06:13:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
'Cos bush has no argument against the nuclear program of Iran...Then Ahmadinejad is a really smart man and i really don't think that Bush would want to look like a fool beside him...
And also because it seems that the IAEA found out that the US "congressional report contained serious distortions of the agency's own findings on Iran's nuclear activity"...So I don't see how Bush is going to explain this to Ahmadinejad...
2006-09-14 13:34:48 · answer #5 · answered by Tinkerbell05 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is a horrible political speaker, and Ahmadenijhad is very charismatic. The debate would give Americans the wrong opinion, because Ahmadenijhad would win.
2006-09-14 07:23:23 · answer #6 · answered by Tofu Jesus 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bush is unable to stand up to a men like Ahmadenijad or Chavez. He is surrounded by Yes-men who do not challenge him. As soon as he doesn't have a script to read (and he can barely do that) from, he is lost like a puppy in the desert.
The Bush junta will certainly not let him (even if he would want to) debate someone. We can all vividly recall the debates he had with Kerry and how miserably he failed during those debates when all he had to do was answer to pre-arranged questions in a setting that was highly friendly.
Let's face it, Bush is not a president, he is a puppet-dent. He is a persona that was crafted in order to be the public image of a junta that has nothing but criminal intention and caters to the super-rich and powerful.
2006-09-14 05:56:12 · answer #7 · answered by The answer man 4 · 4⤊ 3⤋
They're playing Political Chess.
2006-09-14 06:01:56 · answer #8 · answered by John R 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because Bush is a terrorist, he do not like peace at all. He want worsen the situation so that he can have his reason to invade Iran
2006-09-14 05:57:28 · answer #9 · answered by muzyne 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Because they will then have to talk about the International law,fairness,logic,rights of nations and other ideas which Bush does not like.He prefers using his army.
2006-09-14 06:06:59 · answer #10 · answered by incredible22 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
bush only knows how to "stay the course" iran is an "axes of evil" (not george though) so the must anialte iran also.
2006-09-14 06:50:10 · answer #11 · answered by jpknute1 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋