Or, u think USA is NOW more at RISK of attacks, than it was
pre-9/11 ?
2006-09-13 20:23:12 · 11 answers · asked by Peter_Jackson_Fan 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
We're definately more at risk, but I think the intel community and Law Enforcement on both the federal, state and local levels should be praised for their tireless efforts since 9-11-01. I used to be pretty cynical with regards to the FBI, CIA and NSA, ...but now I wouldn't want to have them giving me an up close and personal experience, if you know what I mean. If George W. Bush wants to take the credit for that then I guess the answer to your question would be yes.
2006-09-13 20:40:41 · answer #1 · answered by CV59StormVet 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I won't say either way, but I will say that the attacks happened under his leadership, didn't they? So how do you get success out of that?
I don't think the U.S.A are at risk on their own soil.
I would think - but it's only my opinion - that whoever orchestrated the attacks knew they were going to be a one-off event. They had to have anticipated it would change security forever in the U.S.
I think the U.S is most at risk of having their overseas interests attacked - embassies, etc - in countries with less stringnet security.
2006-09-14 03:27:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
more at risk definitely. the issue of tension between the West and the Middle East should have been handled with a much more multilayered and 2-way approach. This administration, however, has set the tone for the future.
2006-09-14 03:32:54 · answer #3 · answered by niwriffej 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pre 9/11 was the good old days. George is not a successful person.
2006-09-14 03:28:43 · answer #4 · answered by pickle head 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think we are more at risk because we have made more people hate us than ever before.
I think we have not been attacked because the Al Kada wasted most of their crazies on the 911 attack.
If we had pursued diplomatic routes, I think we would have gotter Ben Lauden a long time ago.
2006-09-14 03:26:20 · answer #5 · answered by San Diego Art Nut 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
We are more at risk! We have more people pissed, especially in Iran and even other militant Muslims!
Bush has done squat about terrorism! Iraq had nothing to do with terrorist!
2006-09-14 03:36:17 · answer #6 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We are definitely more at risk now than we were before, even with certain security precautions being taken.
2006-09-14 03:33:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with that. These terrorists would attack any country for submitting to their rotten ideologies. keep up the good work Mr. Bush
2006-09-14 03:26:40 · answer #8 · answered by Rammohan 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
*giggles*
I'm sorry - everytime there is an attack in the rest of the world America feels like they are next.
Is that success?
2006-09-14 03:29:46 · answer #9 · answered by Tish-a-licious 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, Bush is successful in this matter.
2006-09-14 03:28:11 · answer #10 · answered by pyj 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋