Well vehicle armor citations are not entirely accurate. Armor was sufficient for what was thought to be the threat. What occurred was the use of "tank buster" RPG by the Iraqi forces and later insurgents. These tank busters were sold to Iraq by the Russians This was a violation of the sanctions.
But here is to answer the main question. I am going to vent here, so I apologize now instead of later.
It WAS NOT UNTIL BUSH CAME IN OFFCIE THAT OUR TROOPS RECEIVED A PAY RAISE! UNDER CLINTON WE DID NOT RECEIVE ONE! ACTUALLY IT WAS UNDER CLINTON THAT OUR MILITARY WAS DEGRADED BY HALF. SO THAT IS WHY WE HAVE HAD TO SPEND SO MUCH MONEY TO REBUILD IT! ALSO DURING THE CLINTON YEARS WE HAD TROOPS ON WELFARE. THAT IS PITIFUL.
YOU SELFISH PEOPLE! LET US BE ISOLATIONIST. AS FAR AS YOU PEOPLE ARE CONCERNED WE SHOULD HAVE LET HUSSEIN STAY IN POWER. SURE, THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN GREAT. I WISH I CAN GO BACK IN TIME AND STOP THE WAR SO YOU PEOPLE WOULD GET WHAT YOU WANT.
THAT WAY I CAN BLAME YOU PEOPLE FOR EVERY WOMAN AND CHILD SADDAM HUSSEIN WOULD KILL.
YOU ARE THE SAME PEOPLE THAT BACKED CLINTON IN YUGOSLAVIA. BUT SINCE IT WAS A LIBERAL IT WAS OKAY. YUGOSLAVIA WAS NOT A THREAT, BUT WE WENT THERE TO HELP PEOPLE! I HAD FRIENDS THAT DIED THERE.
SO WHO CARES HOW WE GOT INTO IRAQ. WE ARE THERE TO HELP PEOPLE, HUMAN BEINGS FOR GODS SAKE.
YOU PEOPLE MAKE ME ILL. TO THINK I SERVED FOR YOU PATHETIC SELFISH PEOPLE! WHAT THE HELL YOU PEOPLE KNOW ABOUT WAR? YOU JERKS DON'T NO NOTHING ABOUT WAR.
TROOPS KNOW WHAT WAR IS-NOT YOU. WHAT DO YOU KNOW ABOUT NON-ACTIONS.
HERE IS A FACT FOR ALL YOU PEOPLE. REENLISTMENT IS OVER 80%. HEY THE TROOPERS MUST BELIEVE IN WHAT THEIR DOING. SO WAHT YOU GET A COUPLE OF SOLDIERS ON TV COMPLAINING, SO WHAT. THOSE ARE THOSE SAME SOLDIERS THAT COMPLAIN ABOUT RUNNING DURING P.T.
SEMPER FI for life.
Going to bed now. Thank You or letting me vent. Give all the thumb downs you want.
2006-09-13 20:43:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Kountry 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
nicely it rather is a generalisation, so it rather is a faux premise. That mentioned, strikes frequently communicate louder than words because of the fact action variations the state of the international greater desirable than words. If somebody insulted you on the line and you mentioned "i'm VERY offended at you, you shall no longer pay attention the tip of this. i would be writing you a protracted letter explaining intimately why you're an ignorant prick". Rawr." could it deliver the message you decide directly to deliver? No. Breaking his nostril on the different hand, could, in fact, communicate louder than words. As a private occasion, I even have been asserting to myself and rather all of us around me that i will examine 24/7 this 12 months because its my very final 12 months at college and it determines my type. merely words. My procrastination (action) is the overriding reason for my failure. it is not so undesirable however, I study employer and various what we study is a pile of ambiguous crap on paper that may not help me once I set my very own employer up...
2016-12-12 08:10:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your Right! Sad the other day, on the 9/11 memorial at Arlington National Cemetery...they buried a 18 year old Marine who died in combat overseas. What a heroic young man, a young man who gave up his life while the President of Iraq shakes hands with the President of Iran? While the Taliban is stronger than ever, destroying the schools our soldiers built, terrorizing the land with anti-American propaganda! Where will this war go? How many more young men and women will give their lives for a cause that has no guarantees!
2006-09-13 20:03:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Fitforlife 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
The non-action is with the Democrats, not Bush. He's doing something about the terrorist problem, unlike Clinton who just ignored it.
Try looking up WW2 & seeing how many soldiers were killed in that war. Thank God polls were not taken daily in that war by Democrats or we would never never won.
About time some of these liberals realize we are at war & stop helping the enemy !
2006-09-13 20:04:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by george g 5
·
3⤊
4⤋
Those who enlist do so willingly, and are fully aware of the risks. The security of our families and loved ones are NEVER needless.
2006-09-13 20:11:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
how about bill clinton and his non-action the terrorist have been at war with us for along time i am glad bush is doing something
2006-09-13 21:07:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He is a politician
2006-09-13 20:03:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
What non-actions? He has done more than Gore or Kerry would! If Gore or Kerry made it, we would all be praying to "allah"!
2006-09-13 20:00:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
he sent them over there without sufficient body or vehicle armor - that non-action alone speaks volumes to me!
2006-09-13 19:58:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by CharliePhxAZ 4
·
2⤊
4⤋
Theres nothing else to say about him...
2006-09-13 20:05:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by whatever 3
·
1⤊
2⤋