After watching it, I couldn't believe how bad the story really is.
And after seeing it on some best movies lists it just made me ask, is anyone out there who agrees with me?
~~~~SPOILER~~~~~~
Putting everything else aside, they want us to believe a group of people thinks raising their children with a morbid fear of "the Others" and of ever crossing the “Zone”, living with a terrible panic of being killed at night by something and living surrounded by the same 20 people is an amazing environment that creates stable, peaceful, full of joy people who love everyone else???
I don't think so.....
What were all those great actors thinking?
2006-09-13 19:34:14 · 17 answers · asked by cifurtrue 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
I'm glad I didn't see it in theatres, but it was very weird - creepy, strange, weird - and kind of messed up.
2006-09-13 19:39:53 · answer #1 · answered by ♥michele♥ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I, personally, didn't care for the movie. I understood it though. There's more meaning behind that movie because, surprisingly enough, it's based off of a true story.
There's a similar encampment where people separated themselves from society and so as not to blow the cover, they let the blind girl who couldn't see have to figure the way out on her own.
Personally, I think one of the people who could actually see should've gone, but the reasoning behind that goes back to the true story and where the people couldn't make themselves known.
It's at that point where the story makes more sense, but for people watching unaware that it's a true story, it comes out all garbled in translation.
However, in my opinion, I don't think people would really care for it even if they did know that it was based off of a true story. It may serve as a novelty and make sense, but it still disappointing because of all the deception that was involved in order to scare the people into submission so that they'd never cross over to discover the real world.
2006-09-14 02:48:14 · answer #2 · answered by Link of Hyrule 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
*put two hands up* I thought it was just plain horrible, it was a horrible script! the only thing that didn't make me stop the movie after the first half hour was Mr Joaquin Phoenix!!! He is such an awesome actor!
2006-09-14 02:51:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It wasn't a bad script. But everything was so predictable that people didn't care for the ending,
2006-09-14 02:37:40 · answer #4 · answered by David Cross fan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree!
That was the worst movie ever.
The ending was terrible and so unexpected in the bad way. It was like a "what the f*ck?!?!" instead of "Wow I didn't see that coming!"
2006-09-14 02:36:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Even Shakespeare couldn't be Shakespeare every time out the gate.
2006-09-14 02:45:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it was a terrible movie. i couldn't even sit through the whole thing. Signs is the best.
2006-09-14 02:37:58 · answer #7 · answered by bumblebee 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just awful. I know some people do cartwheels over this new movie director/producer, but he doesn't do a thing for me.
2006-09-14 02:36:44 · answer #8 · answered by george g 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have not seen it yet but I still plan on seeing it even though alot of people I know have said it sucked.
2006-09-14 02:42:50 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Village. It made me mad. Glad i didnt watch it in the theater.It was one of those bad twists.
2006-09-14 02:55:18 · answer #10 · answered by T7000 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋