2006-09-13 19:17:23 · 10 answers · asked by Jetha 1 in Sports ➔ Cricket
No way
2006-09-13 19:22:45 · answer #1 · answered by VIKRAM 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
While agreeing with and supporting Zuhair's views expressed earlier, I think there was a bit of mistake committed by the Pakistan management. They could not realize or anticipate how serious turn the whole episode could have taken. Otherwise they could have found a way out to both completing the match and at the same time registerting their protest.
2006-09-14 06:26:09 · answer #2 · answered by Abrar 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think the ball tampering rule is so ambigous it should be scrapped or at least made more clear. inzamam did the wrong thing. he should have waited till the end of the match to protest the decision.
2006-09-14 05:00:17 · answer #3 · answered by sucking sux 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes he was...any captain would have done the same...those captains who r saying that inzi shouldnt have done that r saying so coz they r not a part of the situation....its very natural that once u r acused for cheating...it means that u have insulted the game..threfore there was no use continue playing....
2006-09-14 03:29:22 · answer #4 · answered by Zuhair-from-pakistan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was not at all justified in refusing to take the field
2006-09-14 02:36:10 · answer #5 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Actually mistakes were made by both Inzi and Darell Hare....
2006-09-14 03:51:26 · answer #6 · answered by Mank 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think he was quite righ. he was justified s because some step would have to be taken against hair like partial umpires
2006-09-14 02:28:57 · answer #7 · answered by nikhil 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes
2006-09-14 02:29:54 · answer #8 · answered by dibyendu 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No don't think so
2006-09-14 03:01:00 · answer #9 · answered by jason 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no
2006-09-14 05:27:53 · answer #10 · answered by rajan naidu 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋