2006-09-13 18:51:03 · 10 answers · asked by JAMES 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
only god knows....all that i know is that theyre fighting for no reason and innocent people are getting killed
2006-09-13 19:02:45 · answer #1 · answered by ♥ hey! 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are two possible outcomes based on our coalition's decisions within the next three to five years. As of now, the governments of America, UK, Australia (the best), etc. have two options which are dependent entirely on who is elected after Bush, and their influence on politics. First of all, war can continue to brim in Iraq (and possibly even more Middle East countries will become involved) thus making WWIII a reality and further scarring the Christian/Muslim tolerance of each other. The next, and ironicly less apealing option would be to withdraw the troops. Now, let me tell you why that is a less desirable option. For one, it would take a few years for everyone to be out of the Middle East, further increasing the death toll as soldiers are slowly picked off with less and less relief. And, once the coalition leaves, Iraq will be left a shambled anarchy, allowing Russia to sweep in, take claim to the Middle East, and become the new world power. Unfortunately, whatever America says happens in Iraq goes. Not that I believe they would make the wrong decision, I just realize that without the U.S. backing up the UK and Australia, we have no reason to be their either. So, as you can see, getting involved in Iraq was a big mistake, but if you are American, please don't make it worse by voting for Hilary Clinton, as she will undoubtedly urge the withdrawl of U.S. troops.
2006-09-13 19:12:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on Iran.
If anyone noticed Iran is between Iraq and Afghanistan. Iran has always been the target, because they have always supported terrorism. Usama bin Laden set up Majahideen camps and Iran would train the fighter. Usama would set up a terrorist camp Itan would iran the terrorists.
It is called strategy. The US and other will attack Iran with or without internal Irainian anti-government groups. When this happens we will be on both sides. Iran cannot fight a battle on two fronts.
2006-09-13 20:07:55 · answer #3 · answered by Kountry 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush will loose his war in Iraq,, because he is a looser, not the troops, they will pay the price for Bush bogged down policy there,, but US troops are the best military in the world, but have the worst president and Secretary of defense in American history..................
2006-09-13 19:01:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not sure "what will be happened in Iraq". Do you?
2006-09-13 18:56:56 · answer #5 · answered by Cinner 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We should give Iraq to the Kurds.
2006-09-13 22:41:47 · answer #6 · answered by rochambeau 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Our goal is to take out the civilian population by Christmas.
2006-09-13 18:53:22 · answer #7 · answered by surfinthedesert 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
civil war....oh wait, that's been happening for two years already...never mind
2006-09-13 18:53:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
everyone exploded becuase I said
2006-09-13 18:55:51 · answer #9 · answered by ĢηøMΞ ¤ GứҰ ™ 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is your first name "Lou"?
2006-09-13 18:59:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋