Who is more dominant in their sport??
Are we watching two of the greatest athletes of all time perform..?
2006-09-13 18:02:23 · 6 answers · asked by O Jam 3 in Sports ➔ Other - Sports
Woods. No doubt. Federer has to maintain his champion status for a while to make an attempt to have a similar record like Tiger. Tiger has a bright record with longevity.
2006-09-13 18:14:26 · answer #1 · answered by Teoshe 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Federer. Let's see, he has won 9 out of the last 16 grand slam tournaments. Woods has won 9 out of the last 26 grand slams. Federer has won 4 consecutive Wimbledon titles with only dropping 5 sets. In comparison, Sampras dropped 14 sets over the same time period. From 2003 - 2005, Federer set a tennis record by winning 24 straight finals. The previous record was 12. Woods has 53 titles in his 10 year career, Federer has 48 in 8 years so they're pretty close in that respect.
2006-09-14 03:37:25 · answer #2 · answered by Kumiko S 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In my view, Federer. I base my argument on the fact that this guy never seems to exert himself (unlike, say Ivan Lendl) who ever is his opponent. And accepts the rare defeat gracefully. But never loses a single point without a fight. He is just too good to be true. Better than the Mc Enroes.
2006-09-14 01:13:39 · answer #3 · answered by slender 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
woods definitely, he changed the meaning of the game golf, he had several grandslams, and he recently won 5 of his last 7 games if im not mistaken, the other games he didnot won, he scored 2nd place. go tiger!!!
2006-09-14 01:09:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
both of them dominant in their sport, but i'd prefer rafael nadal rather than federer.
2006-09-14 06:07:17 · answer #5 · answered by classy naima 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's a draw.
2006-09-14 01:17:45 · answer #6 · answered by Paul 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋