English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Explain why this is an example of constitutional moderation and an avoidance of extremes?

2006-09-13 17:57:29 · 4 answers · asked by tanyas_11207 1 in Politics & Government Government

4 answers

It is one example of the checks-and-balances involved with the separation of powers. The Constitution lays out the three branches: Legislative (Article 1), Executive (Article 2) and Judicial (Article 3); our founding fathers decided on this primarily to avoid a Britain-esque governmental autocracy. Each branch of the government has more or less equal power but this has changed throughout the history of this country. At first the Legislative branch was deemed the most significant due to them being chosen to represent the people and to make the laws. Over time the Executive branch has gained power, particularly in foreign policy and war. The Legislative branch has tried to reign this in, for example the War Powers Act in 1973 limiting the President's powers in enabling a war without full congressional support (to avoid another Vietnam). The Judicial branch has supported and gone against both of the other branches being somewhat of an equalizer...at times. I'm not sure if this is what you are looking for but it really boils down to checks and balances in a government designed to protect our rights designed through natural law and a social contract and legitimized in the Bill of Rights.

2006-09-13 18:22:59 · answer #1 · answered by Christina 2 · 0 0

There are some flaws on your argument. First, they could desire to have a 2/3 majority to override a veto, and that's plenty greater durable to do than only get an basic majority. additionally, the administrative branch does enact some rules of its own. as an occasion, Bush went into Iraq and not utilising a invoice from Congress, because of the fact he replaced into the Commander in chief. additionally, the president can set regulations for different administrative companies, however if a number of the strikes do ought to be authorized by way of Congress. Congress's best ability is they administration the handbag strings. in the event that they do no longer finance the president's courses, and he does not have discretionary money he can use for those courses, he has a situation.

2016-12-15 07:48:42 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The power that Congress has to override the President's veto is simply to keep a President from vetoing legislation that all of Congress thinks is a good bill. The President can only honestly veto legislation where there are a large differences of opinion. To answer your question, Article 1, section 7, is an example of constitutonal moderation and an avoidance of extremes.

2006-09-13 19:11:12 · answer #3 · answered by Gunrunner 2 · 0 0

you need either a majority plus the President or a 2/3 majority to get anything done, and given the diversity of America no extreme can get this, except the Christians.

2006-09-15 07:04:20 · answer #4 · answered by MBK 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers