2006-09-13 17:11:47 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
I think she is a very misunderstood former mistress. She's misunderstood by more than just the public. I think she was misunderstood by her first husband. The media only hurt her more than she already was. I also don't think she completely understands her position and role in the royal family.
2006-09-15 02:49:54 · answer #1 · answered by coolmom 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Camillia was not cut out to be Queen, she suggest an affair with Charles, as her Grandmother had done with a former King. Since she had slept around so much, there was no way she would have been acceptable as a future Queen. She was happy with all the perks and trimmings with none of the responsibility.... funnily enough she is now beginning to look as miserable and acting as "mad" as Diane, by recently storming of the boat when they were on holiday and returning to her OWN home! Don't think Diane was a total saint, but her words there are 3 of us in this marriage has to be pretty close to the truth!
2006-09-13 22:38:09 · answer #2 · answered by Breeze 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Misunderstood - all these Diana-worshippers conveniently forget she, too, had her own affairs, and refuse to give Camilla a chance. She will be a good queen, and should have married Charles to begin with.
And I'm tired of all these slurs on her appearance. Imagine how Diana would have looked at 60, or look at Camilla 30 years ago. I think Camilla is better looking - nice eyes, nice smile, more interesting than Diana.
2006-09-13 20:26:52 · answer #3 · answered by Dunrobin 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
misunderstood all the way - can you imagine being her? Half the world would trade her in for Di to come back if they could. How would that make you feel? I really don't think there were any bad guys in that whole mess, just a lot of sadness on all accounts.
2006-09-13 17:20:52 · answer #4 · answered by niwriffej 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
She and Charles were victims of the whole stupid set of rules that royalty is expected to adhere to. She was the one he loved from the beginning, and I'm glad he finally had the courage to stand up on his hind legs and say "I am going to marry her." So much pain could have been spared if he had done that before he married Diana instead of caving in to the whole royalty expectation. He followed the royal family's rigid rules about who he could marry instead of doing what any normal human being would have done. I wish them much happiness now that they are finally together, and I hope she'll be queen someday.
2006-09-13 17:52:10 · answer #5 · answered by Maple 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
How dare you insult the snake! That particular snake is innocent. Can't say the same for Camilla (or Charles!),
2006-09-13 17:15:20 · answer #6 · answered by looking good 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Duchess Camilla Parker-Bowles-Windsor of Cornwall is a very manipulative and untrustworthy character. She cheats on her husband with a possible future King, while he is married to our dear and sadly missed Princess of Wales. She had designs on Charles long ago and plotted and won. Now she can wear big ugly hats and spend the royal allowance/civil list money and pretend to be above the fray, but she is the lowest person I have seen climb to such disgusting heights in a long time. She is the Duchess of Frump, Gorilla Smack her Jowels. She makes me ill.
2006-09-13 21:12:06 · answer #7 · answered by Out $1000 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
She is horrible--ruining Diana's life like that..I bet she has no remorse whatsoever for the heartache she caused with her immorality. Her day is coming.
Plus she's ugly as sin, inside and out, especially when compared to
Diana's beautiful interior and exterior.
Charles is a jerk too. I hate adultery for all the pain it causes and women should be the keepers of morality as they know men are weaker and how men hurt women. She should be able to put themselves in anther's shoes, but sadly many don't.
2006-09-13 18:57:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Little bit of both but ''all is fair in love and war'. Let's not forget she was there first.
2006-09-14 08:34:28 · answer #9 · answered by ayanagin 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definatly a snake...
And an ugly one too!
2006-09-13 17:15:44 · answer #10 · answered by starlinnq 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋