English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I'm talking ugly here! To boxy or too fat, too short or too tall, or just pain poor concept, poor vision, poor taste.

The Studebaker Lark looked liked a compressed MB, the Edsel looked like a vagina coming at you.

You get the idea. Have fun!

2006-09-13 17:05:59 · 23 answers · asked by Doc Watson 7 in Cars & Transportation Other - Cars & Transportation

23 answers

Toyota Scion....looks like a toaster on wheels.

2006-09-13 17:07:07 · answer #1 · answered by chrstnwrtr 7 · 0 0

For whoever said the Chrysler K-cars were a flop and P.O.S, they obviously know not what they speak. The K-cars were insanely popular with mainstream American families and sold in bulk to rental fleets. Heck, even the so-called "ugly" woody panel models are now colletibles! The Chrysler 2.2L and 2.5L 4cyls. designed for these cars are incredible reliable, speaking from personal experience, and the A-body Chryslers (K-car derivatives) were rated one of the most reliable car in 1991 by JD Power and Associates. I love how people rant when they have no clue what they're talking about. Boob...

So anywho, the ugliest would have to be the Pontiac Aztec, which first comes to mind. The Honda Element, Scion Box, Buick Rendevous, Chevy Citation, the new 4x2 Toyota Tacoma (tiny tires and sits stupidly low, like they always have), Lincoln Blackwood, Chevy Avalanche/Cadillac ESV, too many cars from the 70's to name (didn't anything pretty come out of the 70's, jeesh!), any car that looks like a dustbuster, ala Honda Accord and Civic, 80's Mustangs, every single BMW produced in the last few years, as well as most 80's BMWs, Hummers (a.k.a. "I have lots of money and a small penis"), and probably more I can't think of at the moment.

2006-09-13 19:33:10 · answer #2 · answered by palebeachbum 4 · 1 0

The Pontiac Astek, The Chevrolet Imperial. Not to mention the Lark..uh. What was wrong with Ford when the launched the Edsel? The mechanicals were sound but the *******faceof the car ensured that the poor Ed(didn't)Sell.

2006-09-13 17:44:53 · answer #3 · answered by www.quartermile.in 3 · 1 0

The G Class Mercedes

http://www.kyosho.ru/auto/images/auto029_20.gif

2006-09-13 17:15:19 · answer #4 · answered by curiositykillz 4 · 0 0

Pontiac Aztec... two thumbs down, I wish I had two more hands so I could give it 4
Scions look like matchbox toys
The new Toyota Land Cruiser leaves a LOT to be desired
H3 from Hummer.... yawn
Luxury SUV's ie: Lexus, Mercedes Benz (BMW is borderline) What is the point of a Luxury SUV?

Pontiac Minivans in general
Minivans

2006-09-13 17:57:45 · answer #5 · answered by Porterhouse 5 · 1 0

The Nash Metropolitan was a total pig; it looked like an upside-down bathtub.

2006-09-13 17:19:46 · answer #6 · answered by kamaole3 7 · 1 0

I think GM continues to create ugly cars. Which one is really good looking?

And for the person above. The K-cars probably was ugly but they were bought in masses by the public and as rentals and it saved Chrysler when Iacocca was president.

2006-09-13 17:14:38 · answer #7 · answered by hocky_06 3 · 2 1

The old type Ford Anglia

2006-09-13 19:01:57 · answer #8 · answered by swenson0 5 · 1 0

AMC Vehicles expecally the one in the movie Wayne's world!

2006-09-16 21:44:53 · answer #9 · answered by SOLUN macedonia 3 · 0 0

I hated the Pacer. Damn thing looked like a fishbowl on wheels.

2006-09-13 17:09:17 · answer #10 · answered by ? 2 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers