Which would the bleeding heart liberal come to the aid of first?

Question

A 9/11 attacker or a defenseless baby in a womb?

Answer 1

I would say 9/11 attacker, but they think Bush did it and they wouldn't help Bush if he was drowning. I would say a baby, but they need them to feed their abortion machines. I'm gonna have to say none. Now a tree.............

Answer 2

London now has much less people than it did interior the 1930, and the inhabitants is in intense decline because of the low start cost. If we don't enable immigration the united kingdom we are able to pay a intense cost. The immigrants are the life blood of any greater united states - they are extra led to than the locals. just about all susccess in uk are from the immigrant community. Alan Sugar? M&S Odeon cinemas to call yet some. you basically have confidence the people who sell newspapers, incredibly in 50 years from now the inhabitants of uk would be under that's in the present day and that's with modern cost of imigration. And to get this in stability the U. S. inhabitants will double to 6 hundred miliion by utilising then, they are going to be rich and we can be poor by utilising 2040. Europe has a matching inhabitants to the U. S. yet we are in intense decline it is going to fall to in straightforward terms 0.5 of the U. S. inhabitants in below 50 years and all the governments be responsive to it.

Answer 3

probably the baby in a womb but I wouldn't hold my breath on that one.

Answer 4

You know if women had to pay a republican everytime a woman had a abortion, they would be all for it! Even though I dont agree with Dems. on this issue I will support a womens right to choose. Look at republicans, they would rather throw a fetus in the garbage instead of giving it to science to help cure diseases, who are the real monsters! Idiot.