English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

To love and lose or to never love at all.

I think it is better to love, then never love at all.

I love you.

2006-09-13 14:48:55 · 15 answers · asked by TommyLovesU 1 in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

15 answers

I think it is better to have loved then to have never loved at all, the emotion can be a big part of your life. I love people!

2006-09-13 15:00:34 · answer #1 · answered by masterurownmind 5 · 0 0

To love

2006-09-13 21:51:16 · answer #2 · answered by tcm. :) 4 · 1 0

I'm with you on that, I would much rather love and lose, than to never have loved at all.
Love ya!

2006-09-13 21:50:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I agree with you. To love then never love at all.

2006-09-13 21:52:56 · answer #4 · answered by angelfish 3 · 0 0

to never love

2006-09-13 22:00:05 · answer #5 · answered by joalteeth 3 · 1 0

to love love love love

2006-09-13 21:53:04 · answer #6 · answered by Macey 6 · 0 0

never love at all

2006-09-14 06:04:20 · answer #7 · answered by **** if i know 7 · 0 0

love and keep on loving,never a loss to love.

2006-09-13 23:14:27 · answer #8 · answered by sllyjo 5 · 0 0

It is always better to love. There is nothing like it.

2006-09-13 22:03:02 · answer #9 · answered by Still a Sexy Momma 5 · 0 0

Too love and lose.

2006-09-13 21:50:53 · answer #10 · answered by Judas Rabbi 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers