They normally lie and favor the Libs
2006-09-13 14:24:50 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Clinton bears a decent amount of the blame, but BERGER shoulders a HUGE amount of it. He knows it too. It is why he was attempting to sneak documents out of the national archives (Top Secret ones) in his pants. (And yes libs, he did get caught, which is how we know he did it)
I think the filmmaker (which was not ABC, they just paid for the rights to air it... although edited from the filmmaker's intended release... thanks to political heat by Clinton and crew) got it pretty damn accurate.... we know it cannot be 100% accurate because some portions had to be drawn from creative interpretation... because a portion of this is only done from a report, and other portions had to be 'made up' for we don't know actual speech from terrorists at times when they are on the street or in a car or whatever
2006-09-13 14:31:22 · answer #1 · answered by DiamondDave 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Funny that Jeb Bush was having DINNER WITH BIN LADEN'S BROTHER THE NIGHT BEFORE 9/11. But you don't mention that. Also, ONLY, ONLY Saudi Arabians were allowed in American AIR SPACE after the Tower Crashes and NO ONE ELSE! The bin Laden family was allowed to flee the country, and all other arabs, YET 15 of the terrorists were ARABS. The Bushes dining with the bin Ladens the night before!!! HMM, makes you think . . .
2006-09-13 21:32:26 · answer #2 · answered by AdamKadmon 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well to even the playing field, and not look bias, Bush could have had him in Tora Bora as well and failed to jump on it by sending the requested reinforcements during the battle.. . Plus he flew out a whole plane load of bargaining chips just after 911 when he sent the plane carrying Bin Laddens family from the US. WHY HAVE NONE OF YOU QUESTIONED WHY THIS WAS
2006-09-13 21:35:17 · answer #3 · answered by Shawn S 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You can't blame Clinton or Bush for what happened. There are a lot of morons in this country that don't realize the president doesn't run everything. There are many departments of the government that are at fault for 9/11.
2006-09-13 21:30:12 · answer #4 · answered by invincible 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
That 9/11 film is inaccurate. It was the pentagon that vetoed Clinton's plan to get Bin Laden. But you could ask the Republican's why they pressured him so much for a silly little thing, when he had better things to do than defend himself in court!
2006-09-13 21:33:16 · answer #5 · answered by elge13 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They didn't have a choice.
The oversight and critical reviews were based on actual transcripts and real events - and both sides of the isle were trying desperately to put the best light on themselves.
Result: The show seems to be pretty unbiased in telling it like it was.
2006-09-13 21:33:22 · answer #6 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You must have missed the second part, you know the part where Bush was taken to task for his failures. You also missed the disclaimer or you can't read. It said it was a dramatization, which means it was a fiction based on events. I did think it was entertaining though and pretty well done.
2006-09-13 21:31:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
You just can't trust the Corporate media. A month ago you would have called ABC a liberal media outlet.
Personally, what is the big deal? Both of the idiots were at fault.
2006-09-13 21:26:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Because- it's about time somebody tells the truth. He also pardoned the terrorists who were involved in the Cole, Embassy and 1st WTC bombing then they went on to carry out 9-11. It is a good thing they are limited to two terms or people would have voted for him again and he would have been in the White House on September 11.
2006-09-13 21:28:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋
That was not the Truth, that was a TV show with alot of made up LINES.
2006-09-13 21:48:28 · answer #10 · answered by timer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋