Someone said that the demolition of the WTC looked to be the effect of pre-planted explosives (more)..........

Question

and not just a regular collapsing of buildings due to airplanes striking it...hmmm...the WTC did kind of fall exaggeratiling and all so its kind of not hard to believe, i do not want the major republican "wing-man" of the bush administration to come here with there political crap, i want someone liberal and that actually researches...and hmmm..maybe even someone who has dealt with demolition. THX YALL. Actual quote i am recieving this theory from.."9/11 Truth: World Trade Center "Collapsed to Dust", "Nothing Left of the Buildings"
Ask yourself, is this the result of a few joints breaking causing a structural failure like what happens when a building falls over from an earthquake, or is this the result of a controlled demolition using pre-planted explosives?"

Answer 1

Not only did all three towers look like they were brought down by controlled demolition, but the owner of WTC7 admitted that it was purposely demolished. Although, he has never explained when the explosives were placed or by who. The 911 commission says it came down by fire, a direct contradiction to the owner. They got to get their story straight.

The official government story is that 911 was orchestrated by Al Queda, which is lead by Osama bin Laden. The proof our government provided was a video with Osama confessing to the crime. The problem with the video is that the person in the video does not look like Osama bin Laden: see picture.
http://911blimp.net/vid_fakeOsamaVideo.shtml
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6oAeK1dlHs&feature=PlayList&p=5C9C5F5FB50EF496&index=9

There are many other factors that do not fit the official story. They include, secondary explosions that were seen, heard, reported, and recorded by firefighters, in and around the buildings.
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4574366633014832928&q=firefighter+bombs+in+the+building
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tEuDeU4IZjE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WtBGKSZNWB4&feature=PlayList&p=5C9C5F5FB50EF496&index=7

Here is a video clip showing a trail of explosions just before the destruction wave.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_DkzhonpGY&mode=related&search=

Molten, beyond red hot, "steel" was video recorded coming out of the South Tower just before it collapsed. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to turn steel to liquid.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk&search=thermite

A chemical analysis of the solidified molten iron yeilded an explosive, called Thermate. Also, see picture of WTC beam possibly cut using a demolition cutting charge (Thermate) or perhaps cut by an Iron Workers torch during rescue operations. Click on pic. to enlarge.
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml

These factors point to a controled demolition of the buildings and thus an inside job. We also have a video recording, where owner Larry Silverstein, admits to demolishing WTC7.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329

There is also a problem with the Pentagon attack. Listen to this retired general, He says, "The Plane does not fit the hole."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2VoUN-7RVU&eurl=

We will not be able to know if 911 was a government cover up, for sure, until we can get our government to conduct an independent investigation, of this tragedy. That may not happen, for the duration of this administration, since it would probably not be, in their best interest. To compound the problem, they can not afford to lose control of the government. Many people are afraid to speak up against this administration, for fear of reprisal. If the situation were to start to get out of hand, the administration could declare marshal law (a police state), on its citizens. There are still many that have not seen beyond the official story: For several years, most of the evidence was swept up.

The majority of hard evidence, that has emerged over the past few years, supports the claim that this tragedy was conducted by our own government. It did this to get the support of congress and the nation, to attack Iraq: Like another Pearl Harbor. Why would they want to do this? You best read it from their own PENAC document. Pay special attention to the section entitled "Creating Tommorrow's Dominant Force" page 50 and the top of page 51, where it states we need a new Pearl Harbor attack to get the ball rolling.
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf

I have been trying to inform people of the evidence that is available to us. Would you take a look at about 8 -10 minutes of this interview with Professor Steven Jones ? It's a 45 minute video and well worth looking at, to its end. At the very least, pass it on to those you care about.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2842384983834100001

Answer 2

Don't believe the conspiracy theory kooks. The upper floors fell into the lower floors creating the compression of the air on the floors causing the pushing out of the air through the windows making it look as if there were explosions. But it was just the expulsion of air being compressed by tons of debris pushing downward. The steel structure was covered with a substance that was known to have been falling off prior to the events of 9-11. This was a fire retardant but it was coming off exposing the steel to the fire of not only the jet fuel but to the desks, walls, flooring paper and other material in the jets and the buildings causing the steel to give way. If asbestos had been used it would have worked much better as a fire retardant, but you know what happened to using asbestos. Also to Mordent above- the Empire State building was struck by a B-17 (due to fog) in 1943 a much smaller airplane than a B-52. All of these theories have been debunked several times by many sources. like the History channel and Popular Mechanics. There is also a book but I don't have the name an author available.

Answer 3

There is no doubt about it.
The governments claims are outside the laws of physics.
Just think about it.
If a building collapsed as result of a fire, which melted steel, would it collapse in just 10 seconds, or would it take longer.
At the base of the WTC the columns in the central core were 36 inches wide by 16 inches deep and 4 inches thick, whereas at the top, these box columns had transitioned to H-sections (I-sections) fabricated from 3/4 inch steel.

Jet fuel burns at 500 degrees c and steel of this type melts at over 1000 degrees c.

There are hundreds of references on the net proving the physical impossibility of the governments story

Answer 4

You can't compare the collapse of the WTC towers to any other building in the world.
Most buildings are block framed structures.Thats is to say they are built buy making small square frames like blocks, and assembling them together and stacking them,the support is on the inside.
WTC towers are tube structures..the support is on the outside.
They will and did act different when a plane hits them and the collapse would not be the same.

Answer 5

Yeah there was never a building that collapsed because of fire, there was also never a 110 story building that had a 767 deliberatly flown into it at hundreds of miles per hour full of 10,000 gallons of jet fuel either. I'll say it again when the war starts we should take these conspiracy guys out first. A few joints breaking!!!! 10 full floors of the bleeping buildings were totally engulfed, for over an hour, temps approximatly 2500 - 3000 degrees, ( or was that tens of millions of peoples imaginations )

Answer 6

Did you not see videos of planes flying into those buildings?
Do you not think that such an impact would shake a building to its foundations?
Do you believe every rumor you hear or read? There are people out there who are convinced the moon landing was staged in Hollywood. And what about the Flat Earth Society?

These WTC conspiracy theories are just preposterous. Somebody has waaay too much time on their hands!

Answer 7

The builders stated that the frame of the WTC was made of an aluminum alloy which makes the melting point lower. The fire after the impact did in fact destroy the frame, thus the collapse.

Quit with the conspiracy theories. What happened was an organized murder by the most evil of men.

Answer 8

For anyone interested in 9/11 check out this site: http://www.wanttoknow.info/9-11timeline60pg

Its a time line of events surrounding 9/11 from the 70's to the present and each entry has references from the main stream media to back it up. No theories, just facts. Excellent reading.

Answer 9

There has been no record of ANY steel frame skyscraper ever collapsing as a result of fire - prior to the WTC collapse. The Empire State had a B52 crash into it, and it was fine.

The steel frame of the building was almost entirely disintigrated - suggesting that it all lost its structural integrity at the same time, not one bit losing it (at the epicentre of the fire) and the building collapsing around it. That would mean bits of steel from the top and bottom of the building would be left.

If you watch footage of the WTC collapsing you can see little puffs of smoke BELOW the collapse. Just like in a controlled demolition.

Kerosene (jet fuel) burns at a significantly lower temperature than the melting point of steel.

Answer 10

This was NOT a result of a controlled explosion and was a result of the weakening of the structual supports of the building by the collapse of the twin towers.