Does NASA Space Exploration Program Benefits Justify the Costs?

Question

Please Put a Yes or No Answer and List a Resource If You Can or Somewhere I Might be Able To Find This. Thanks /\ /\

Answer 1

Yes

Answer 2

No.

Ask yourself this: what does spending hundreds of billions of dollars on purely ego-driven whimsy such as a trip to Mars go toward protecting your inalienable rights? It doesn't in any way, shape, or form. And that is the only thing a just government exists to do, not to fulfill infinite vanity projects of various competing ideologies.

Even if NASA developed, say, velcro, and a billion people use it today (via private sector manufacturers), velcro was never a fundamental right. Fundamental rights are the only business a government has any business being in. Furthermore, for every company profiting off of a NASA invention (those that weren't actually developed by private contractors), that amounts to corporate welfare / economic development subsidy. I don't know of any business that has any more right to benefit from MY taxes than another (none of them do, and equally so).

The only meaningful thing government would be doing in space would be defense related, and right now the most pressing defense issue would be asteroid / comet / meteor impact countermeasures.

If we're still around in 4 billion years when the sun grows up and boils off our atmosphere, it would perhaps be acceptable to have invested in technology to create a new planet. But in four billion years, who knows what forms of governments (or lack thereof) will be present in the solar system, or universe.

Anything beyond that narrow scope is rightly the province of the private sector. And anything that the private sector might do in that pursuit that might make life down here on the surface more hazardous would rightly be prevented by a just government.

For the record, I grew up as a big space geek and loved all things astronomy and space travel and sci-fi related. But my personal whims don't give me the right to FORCE others to fund such. Anything that is undertaken by a government like that is nothing but force.

Answer 3

are you able to unquestionably positioned a cost on expertise? of direction area exploration is justified in its value. besides the reality that the quantity of quite expenditure that's made on the area software is greater of a "pretend" value. each and each quadrillion money spent on the area holiday is in certainty a central authority subsidy for countless diverse sectors of industry. some company has to return up with the nuts and bolts to place it mutually, some company has to construct the launching pad et cetera, et cetera. It keeps the yankee aerospace industry thriving plenty interior the comparable style via fact the chilly conflict did. It some what resembles parts of the hot deal for the time of the melancholy wherein workers have been paid to dig holes and then paid to fill those comparable holes. that's a stimulus to the completed economic equipment, provide one guy a dollar and he will spend it to that end passing it directly to somebody else. in addition to, the area software invites discovery and invention. It does not in hassle-free terms provide us solutions to what exists on the moon, quite the minds of invention are used to create new chemical components and compounds and machines for this methodology. this may be a significant clarification why companies which incorporate GE, Dupont, and GM all actively participate contained in this methodology. I.E. no area holiday no microwave. or much greater so, no area software: no carbon fiber, no poly-rubbers and the checklist is going on. yet this nevertheless leaves the terrific reason the advantages outweigh the value: expertise. hint your philosophical roots to Socrates and Aristotle and you could not positioned a cost on expertise, seem to the allegory of the cave and merely rearrange the putting, the cave is the Earth and each little thing is physically powerful next to the hearth interior yet there is an entire international exterior the cave that ought to hold the solutions to each little thing, why not circulate away the cave (Earth). Exploration is inherent in human nature and with out it we would have not at all existed via fact we would have all been wiped out with despite bubonic plague or typhoid fever that hit our condensed populations. the international might nevertheless be flat.

Answer 4

not at all. NASA has made some pretty good stuff(for a **** load of money) but very few of which has come from the space exploration program. If the billions of dollars went more specifically toward things that affected us. It would be much more beneficial.

Answer 5

No, They Waste Money On Every Aspect Of The Program.

Answer 6

Not Yet in my opinion

If we ever have to leave Earth and colonize somewhere else, most people would say it was a good investment. Or if NASA diverted or shot down even one large asteroid that was headed for Earth also. Mostly same for military budgets I think.

Answer 7

No.

It should be funded by the private sector and not my paycheck.

Answer 8

yaaa you got miller dont ya mention this in class and ill tell you who this be