English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

but it is okay and considered a free market ,when Americans purchase just about anything else they want from other countries and car companies can move their factories to mexico, toy companies can subcontract to Japan, shoecompanies can produce shoes in Asia, a maojor bank can incorporate bermuda to avoid taxes all in the name of free market? what am I missing here?, is it economics or the ones(pharmacuetical companies) with the biggest payed lobbyists win or determine what is American or what is un American?

2006-09-13 10:12:13 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Business & Finance Other - Business & Finance

9 answers

"cash rules everything around me...get the money...dollar,dollar bill yall"

Wutang

phuc a politician,and phuc the pharmaceutical companies-I sure hope there is a HELL!!!!!

2006-09-14 08:44:23 · answer #1 · answered by str8sik 4 · 1 0

The ones that are doing all the complaining are the one lossing the higher profits, and the politicans that are in their pocket. It is far more against the basic American principal to over charge the sick, and elderly, but then corperations only care about maximising profit, and corrupting the political process to protect their interests.

2006-09-13 16:18:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Many medications we have here are imported from Canada. There is nothing wrong with that.

Most pharma companies exist in several countries at once. I think the objection is that US Pharma and FDA requirements might not be met.

2006-09-13 10:15:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It's not wrong in a moral sense. The American pharmaceutical companies don't want to lose your business.

2006-09-13 10:15:32 · answer #4 · answered by LasVegasMomma 4 · 0 0

Paul, ninety two years previous, became being examined by utilising his well-being care expert. "i could say, Paul, for a guy your age you're in spectacular shape. How do you do it?" "properly, document", reported Paul, "I consume remarkable ,exercising as much as i will daily, and the main substantial project is that God looks after me. Why, if I could arise for the period of the evening to pee, God activates the easy for me the minute I open the door." The well-being care expert went into the waiting room to talk to Paul's spouse and advised her how properly he became doing. He additionally reported what Paul reported approximately God turning on the easy for him. That questioned him. The spouse spoke back, "i'm happy he's doing so properly and, additionally, that does sparkling up the secret of the yellow liquid i discover interior the backside of the refrigerator each morning."

2016-11-07 06:30:53 · answer #5 · answered by winstanley 4 · 0 0

Who says it's unAmerican? Hey when you are in a fixed income you have to do what you have to do

2006-09-13 10:16:05 · answer #6 · answered by limgrn_maria 4 · 0 0

it's not a question or un-American or not. It is also not a question of right and wrong either. It is illegal however.

2006-09-13 18:57:55 · answer #7 · answered by jloertscher 5 · 0 0

Hmm, not UnAmerican...just illegal and you may be risking obtaining fraudulant drugs (i.e. sugar pills)

2006-09-13 10:55:29 · answer #8 · answered by RT 4 · 0 0

It isn't.

2006-09-13 10:14:23 · answer #9 · answered by rhymingron 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers