All of the conspiracy myths have more holes in them than any government account of what happened.
The problem is that most people that believe the myths do not actually take the time to research them.They just want to believe the government is corrupt so badly that you could doctor a few pictures and twist a few words and they will believe anything.
The myth about Flight 77 aka where's the plane boss?
Look at the photos of flight 93 impact zone.
Do you see any big chunks of a plane?...nope.
But somehow people are supposed to believe they should be there in the case of flight 77.
Why?...because someone told them they should be there.
People saying that the debris flying out the windows of the Towers is proof of explosives.
Why?..because someone told them thats what it would look like when explosives are used.
What would it look like for air pressure to escape out the windows as the floors pancaked?
Also the theorist fail to mention that they know little about the construction of the towers,where the load is transfered to the ground,how the structure should react vs how it did react.
The only people with solid proof are the engineers themselves and they say the planes caused the collapse.
The so called "professor" of physics (which by the way doesn't mean he knows squat about controlled demolition) say they collapsed to fast not to be explosives
The main support for the towers was the outside colums,they call it a tube design.
Once the initial shock of the top of the tower falling caused damage to that tube,little is left to hold the towers up...they will come down with little resistance.
There was no inner support structure.
2006-09-13 11:54:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dave 3
·
3⤊
7⤋
I agree.
Also:
Why believe the explanations and the videos of the conspiracy theorists over those of the government, media and testimonies of those who were there that day? After all, how do we know that those conspiracy theorists are not the real conspirators? How do we know that the likes of Alex Jones are not the cynical master conspirators bent on creating chaos and anarchy? How do we know that their aim isn’t to cause the people to lose faith in their government so that they may attain their nefarious goals?
Don't you think that if the government was culpable of such an elaborate scheme as the attacks of 9/11, they would also be capable of silencing all the dissenters who are coming up with the theories?
BTW why didn't they plant WMD's in Iraq? If they are capable of murdering 3,000 of their citizen they weren't going to have guilt spasms about planting some yellow cake around Baghdad.
2006-09-13 10:05:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by scarlettt_ohara 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
The evidence is out there, the only people who refuse to believe it are people who use doublethink. This government still has a chance I believe to get cleaned up before another 9/11 happens and the current puppets in office claim more power and control over our lives, in the name of " defending the homeland". And voting Democrat will only slow the process down, most are establishment types and will only carry out what Bush is continuing ( gun control, warrantless wiretapping, torture..etc..) in the name of "fighting terrorism", the terrorist that will never be defeated. Bush, Cheney, and a lot of other neo-con fascist have already said that this war may last 100 years.
I am not telling you to do anything, just research with a clear mind, everything that is going on now is going exactly how the PNAC (Project For A New American Century) documents have said. I pray to god we wake up before it goes even further...
God Bless America!
2006-09-14 04:28:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Infowarrior1986 1
·
1⤊
2⤋
The biggest conspiracy theory
The biggest conspiracy theory is that 19 Arabs, who had been under surveillance, conspired together, walked onto four commercial aircraft without being detected, and without having their names appear on a passenger list. Then that they could overcome over 250 people with plastic box-cutters. And not only that, but with no previous experience of flying large jets, they could navigate from 30,000 feet and hit three out of four targets precisely, meantime conducting flying manoeuvres that fighter pilots would find difficult. Then, the amazing thing is that 7 of them survived the events and are known to be alive today.
Also for the first time ever in history, three, not two, but three steel framed buildings collapsed as a result of fire which could not possibly have burned hot enough to melt steel, and caused the buildings not to topple over, as one might expect, or to fall a little at a time, but to fall within their own footprint at the speed of gravity. And one of those buildings (WTC7) was not even hit by a plane.
Not only that, but the four aircraft disappeared completely without a trace of their 16 large engines, or any of the black boxes. This has also never before happened in history.
This theory is so amazingly full of holes that it is impossible for any sane thinking person to believe, yet that is what the official 9/11 commission report.says.
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false."
-- William Casey, CIA Director (from first staff meeting, 1981)
2006-09-13 20:34:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Check out this site: http://www.wanttoknow.info/9-11timeline60pg
Its a time line of events surrounding 9/11 from the 70's to the present and each entry has references from the main stream media to back it up. No theories, just facts. Excellent reading.
2006-09-13 10:37:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jagatkarta 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
It's spelled 'DOSE' not does.
And I suppose you think that Israel started the war against Hezbollah too.
Too bad you weren't on one of those flights that crashed on 9/11. Then you would know what really happened.
You are a big dummy, and a Democrat.
2006-09-13 10:22:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by exert-7 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
What is the question? Which are the myths the governments version or everyone else's?
2006-09-13 10:37:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Dane 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Another conspiracy theory was that there are WMD's in Iraq.
2006-09-13 10:03:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
what about all the cell phone calls to spouses? (from hijacked planes?)
i've seen the "evidence".
iit's just too hard to believe, on such weak evidence.
2006-09-13 10:32:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by daddio 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
well maybe there's a point about not one going public...
remains to be decided
but you need a does of spelling lessons
2006-09-13 10:12:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by afriendof CLIFFy D 2
·
0⤊
3⤋