what might a colonist have said about the stamp act?

Answer 1

Depends on where the colonist was. If they were anywhere other than North America, probably not much other than to ask how much the stamps were.

If however, we are talking about colonists in America, then the answer is very different. There the colonist had been suffering through a phenomenon called benign neglect. This means essentially that although Parliament had been passing laws regulating colonial activity for year, enforcement had been either loose or nonexistent.

So, our typical American colonist would have complained long and loud about "no taxation without representation" by which they meant that taxes were not binding unless they had been passed by the colonial legislature.

Additionally, since the Stamp Act was a revenue tax, our typical colonist would have protested long and loud because Americans had never paid anything other than direct taxes, that is a tax for a specific purpose, with a tangible result.

How did the colonists respond? By convening the Stamp Act Congress which petitioned for repeal of the law by Parliament and called for non-importation of British gods. The Sons of Liberty insulted stamp officials in the street, destroyed stamp offices, burned stamps publicly, tarred and feathered some officials, and destroyed the homes of others, including the lieutenant governor of Massachusetts.

The result: by November of 1765, virtually all stamp officials in America had resigned, thereby preventing implementation of the act.

Answer 2

Whoever voted a no vote for Jesito has a historical past ideas of decrease than that of a flea. The Colonist had quite fairly some freedom. The stamp tax became unquestionably fairly small and with regard to the only tax that they had. What their beef became isn't being taken care of as British electorate yet as 2d type electorate. In our indoctrination from our public college instructors we hear of those form of taxes yet not at all how little they have been and how short lived they have been. maximum have been handed and a year or 2 later have been repealed and maximum did not overlap. At Boston they might unquestionably purchase the tea for decrease than in England inspite of the tax yet even at that the colonist stood on concept and does not pay. How we've replaced with paying taxes on each and everything and as much as 50%. The colonist paid decrease than a million%. learn human beings, think of.

Answer 3

"No taxation without representation" Stamp Act was a tax placed on paper goods like sugar act was tax placed on tea. Colonist were tired of Parliament taxing them and raising their taxes (which was to pay for the French-Indian War) without being represented and having a say. These acts eventually lead to the Boston Massacre and "the shot heard around the world". It also lead to the organization of the Sons of Liberty.

Answer 4

They definitly didn't like it. As a matter of fact the Colonists threatened tax collectors with tarring and feathering, and few collectors were willing to risk their well-being to uphold the tax. This should be a good enough explanation of what may of been said.

Answer 5

Colonitsts' disdain for the Stamp Act was the first step that lead to the Revolution, wasn't it?

Answer 6

They Give Us no representation in Parliament and, now wish to tax Us into the poor house ? Fellow Countrymen, REVOLT!

Answer 7

have you heard of the American Revolution? that's what they said about it.