Our military had the opportunity to kill between 200 and 300 high ranking terrorists, but did not because they knew you would throw a fit for bombing them during a funeral.
Be honest, how many of you would rant and scream if we would have done so?
2006-09-13 09:27:37 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
yeah, a terrorist cemetary, real sacred.
2006-09-13 09:32:21 · update #1
While under normal conditions I would never agree with bombing a funeral , may God forgive me ,but I wish they would have blown their filthy murdering scurvy @sses to hell. These are not normal people , besides isn't that what they live for ,to blow themselves up and go collect virgins.Although the top guys only encourage the little dummies to blow themselves.
2006-09-13 09:46:26 · answer #1 · answered by locksniffer 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
would you "rant and rave" if terrorists bombed a funeral with 200-300 high-ranking U.S. military officers?
Finally something I can agree with... yeah I'm for killing the guys at the top, but not in a way that just proves their theory that we are terrorists as well, and steps up their recruitment. we've got to stop cutting heads off the hydra. kill the body and the head will die.
2006-09-13 16:31:04 · answer #2 · answered by Aleksandr 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
So, let me understand... Wubya, a true stalwart of liberal ideology, ordered our military to not fire upon some terrorists at a funeral because he felt it would upset the 'liberals' in the US.
Makes total sense.
It was a military decision made on the ground in Afghanistan by US forces to not bomb the gathering or funeral.
Please explain how 'liberals' are a factor.
2006-09-13 17:04:11 · answer #3 · answered by LatexSolarBeef 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
So now the military listens to the liberals on the Y!A site rather than the president?!? I never knew I had so much power. Amazing how this military is being run, huh?
2006-09-13 16:42:04 · answer #4 · answered by MishMash [I am not one of your fans] 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh, yeah. Like our government cares what THOSE LIBERALS think :) hahahahaha.
I would have said Thank God you made one step out of the 345546464 steps back we've taken.
Also, I'd just like to note taht as a lib, i am the first person who seemed happy answering this as opposed to all the cons who seemed bitter with anger at libs... hmmmm...
2006-09-13 16:39:23 · answer #5 · answered by Mac Guru 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Evidence? Link to a non-psycho rightwing website? Anything but hearsay?
2006-09-13 16:42:07 · answer #6 · answered by Schmorgen 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Liberals are never happy about anything or with anything....that is why they ae always blaming someone or something .....
They are unhappy that they are not in power so what do they do they blame G.W.Bush.......It's is not his fault that he soundly whooped the *** of the best the liberal could muster.....
2006-09-13 16:37:15 · answer #7 · answered by General Custer 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
...and when they end up perpetrating more attacks, the Neolibs ask Bush why he didn't get them when he had the chance. There's no way to win with these airheads.
2006-09-13 16:34:21 · answer #8 · answered by rustyshackleford001 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bombing funerals? You are no better than the terrorists. May God forgive your heartless soul.
2006-09-13 16:30:41 · answer #9 · answered by Tofu Jesus 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Were there innocent people at this funeral too? If so, then yes, I would absolutely object.
2006-09-13 16:45:23 · answer #10 · answered by maguire1202 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋