That is, a U.N.-like organization, but one where only democratic freedom-respecting governments can belong (i.e., thugs who take over a nation cannot send their thug-representative), and whose aim is to overthrow dictators and totalitarian governments. The means could be economic, support for local democratic movements, or military; whichever is deemed most efficient and most moral.
Two potential ways of asking "should there be such an organization".
First, morally, would such a thing be justified if it were effective?
Second, would it in fact be effective?
2006-09-13
09:13:24
·
4 answers
·
asked by
A professor (thus usually wrong)
3
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
Londonhawk, I'm for tolerance, but dictatorial governments is not something anyone should be tolerant of. It is not some cultural feature of a people that should be respected. Instead, it is a case where a small number of armed individuals hijack and enslave an entire populace against their will. No one should be tolerant of theft, rape or murder, and absolutely no one should be tolerant of this multiplied by millions, which is what occurs when a nation is under dictatorial or totalitarian rule.
2006-09-13
09:27:50 ·
update #1