If the "Big Bang" occured 13.7 Billion years ago and light is the "Fastest" thing in the Universe how can we?

Question

"SEE" back to the time when the Universe became transparent?

Well you guys are getting close to an answer, please keep trying. 8-)

BTW - this has NOTHING to do with GOD! DUH!

aviophage

HUH!!!!!!!!! Why did you get your PHD from where they thing the Big Bang was 45 Billion years ago???????????

Answer 1

First, there are only scienfic theories. No such thing as a scientific proof, only a mathematical proof. To downplay a scietific theory because it's a theory is to show a complete lack of understanding of the scientific method.

Second, God may have created the Big Bang, but after that he let nature go. To think otherwise is to be a complete moron.

Finally, all emperical evidence follows the Big Bang theory. It's one of the best science has.

In order to get into the meat of your question, you have to start to bring in relativity and time dilation, and to really go at it you have to consider Einstein's General Relativity. But if you want to put in the effort, the science and math are out there.

Answer 2

I'll offer some other ideas presenting them in such a manner that it was digestible for me.

The Hubble Law, which says that redshifts tend to be proportional to distance, offers a simple explanation. Galaxies are perhaps expanding in evenly spaced spherical shells around our point of observation, the Milky Way Galaxy.

The average astronomer is usually apaulled with the idea that the universe has a center. However, I think the Milky Way is the center or near it. Truly though, most of the time people won't accept a center. Though, it would seem that the resdshift indicates that we are within 100,000 light years of the center.

It was Einstein who came up with the idea of a non-expanding cosmos with space curving back upon itself. His equations were later modified to make room for an expanding cosmos.

With risk of sounding heretical, I believe the Milky Way is the center of the cosmos.

Now to the lightspeed question. Let's assume that the universe exploded into existence from a central point and expanded outward. As objects were propelled, various time dialations occurred. Those things in the center were at a different rate of time than those things moving outward. We know that speed affects time. We know that other factors affect time. The Redshift to name one.

One thing that can help a creationist accept various scientific theories is explaining how that light from distant stars get to us if they are millions or billions of years away. Well, it's written that God stretched out the heavens or something like that. Even with this idea, you perceive a big bang of sorts. Time and speeds are affected relative to other time and speeds based on the expanse. More centered points of the universe are affected with a different time rate relative to those other bodies moving outward.

All I have stated is compliant with the theory of relativity. I hope this helps a little.

Answer 3

there is alot of specualtion into the strategies this occurs. some has to do with the theory of relativity and the bending of sunshine. Others think of that quantum physics is the significant. What we do understand is first that mild bends, and so does time. mild is unquestionably the quickest shifting ingredient, yet there are nevertheless barriers. The greater way the mild gets from the source, the weaker that is going to become. additionally, the universe has been increasing, yet not on the comparable velocity it did for the time of the huge Bang. So there is an end someplace. inspite of the Hubble telescope we are in a position to work out galaxies and image voltaic structures hundreds of sunshine years away. whilst we would possibly not at all have the skill to bodily circulate to them, we are in a position to notice them and use equations to degree their strikes. the greater valuable technologies we get, the greater we are in a position to work out. some even speculate in quatum physics and the string theory, which you would be able to warp with time or bend it to work out the different end. it would be like taking a splash string and conserving one end next to the different. yet our technologies and expertise is not any the place close to that yet.

Answer 4

first of all the big bang theory is only a theory we dont know what really happened. second you must have a lot of time on your hands to be thinking about that. third we really cant see back to the time when the universe was transparent because there has to be some sort of something there or we wouldn't know how far away that we are looking.

Answer 5

the big bang didn't happen at earth... We are moving too. So the stuff that blew out is expanding and moving away from us. The light that is being viewed by us was 'sent' by those object way way way far away. We are seeing protogalaxies, but i don't know if we are seeing 'transparency' yet.

Answer 6

The notion of the Big Bang is very well supported by observation and computational verifications; therefore it is generally accepted among competent people.

The generally accepted time of occurrence of the Big Bang is approximately 45.5 billion years in the past, rather than the figure you give. Quite a difference.

The rest of your question is gibberish and does not lend itself to discussion. I agree none of this has to do with God.

Answer 7

There's a lot of compelling evidence for the Big Bang, but what preceded it? The most accepted model is called Inflation.

I suggest you read up on String Theory.
http://www.superstringtheory.com/cosmo/index.html

Answer 8

An excellent point.

And, since the universe was homogeneous before the big bang, why isn't it homogeneous today?

Answer 9

cuz light that we see with a telescope took so many light years to get close enuff for us to see

Answer 10

becauses the source is so far away that it is just arriving at us now.