2006-09-13 06:15:32 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Laden definitely he took many innocent lives without declaring war, but Bush is not far behind he says this war is on terrorism but after seeing farenheit 9-11 u can not change my mind on seeing this war as a personal gain, if it really was a war on terrorism he would be hunting for bin laden like he did for saddam. Also after seeing 9-11 commision report it's sickening how 9-11 could've been prevented starting with how bush and condoleeza were told about the attacks prior to 9-11 but made the decision that the proof did not hold water.
2006-09-13 06:23:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bin Laden, not Bush. Bush is a lousy American, a hypocritical Christian (as he claims to be one), one of the worst Presidents we have ever had, and apparently a very stupid person. However, those things do not make him a terrorist.
Sloppy arguments like yours can discredit even the best viewpoints. Try to control your name-calling. Bush has plenty of genuine mistakes and failings that can give you something to rant about; you don't need to make things up or get carried away like you did here.
2006-09-13 06:28:37 · answer #2 · answered by BoredBookworm 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both in each others eyes.Bin Laden thinks that if he can stand against most powerful nation on the earth,he will be glorified and may be some stupid people think him as a MESSIAH.On the other hand Bush thinks that he can use our might and tax money any way he thinks right even taking risk of getting branded as executing state sponsored terrorism.
2006-09-13 14:57:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
bin Laden is the real terrorist because he attacks civilians, does not follow any form of rules of engagement, does not declare war and does not conduct any forms of diplomacy and is not a legitimate holder of power (not a democracy or a nation).
Bush on the other hand, is a stupid president. Frightens the public into declaring war on foreign lands and is undoubtedly, one of the worst managers/presidents in US history.
2006-09-13 08:28:37 · answer #4 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are talking about father and son. This is not fair.How can you diferentiate between them ?Bush gave birth to Laden, everybody knows it.He nurtured him and brought him up.He gave him best of the training and amos to fight the Russians in Afghanistan.
This is an old story.
What is new about it is that once Laden asked Bush Daddy to allow him to fight election in Oklahama. Daddy didn't agree hence both are fighting.
Silly question, silly answer.. everybody knows it is Bush who is the mother of all terrorism.
2006-09-13 06:32:53 · answer #5 · answered by ♪¢αpη' ε∂ïß♪ ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
bush is THE terrorist and congress are the American AL qaida. why is the American people so easily brainwashed with propaganda.....its because of the infiltration of non -stop mind numbing distractions such as: sports, celebrity lives, gas prices, cool clothes, new gadgets, new products you don't need...etc.
2006-09-13 06:21:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
IF CALL LADEN TO TO BE APROSTIITUE THEN BUSH WOULD BE A PIMP HE IS NAASTIEST AND THE MOST HORNIEST PERSON EVER BORN
THREE GOLDEN WORDS FOR BUSH
**** OFF BUSHY
2006-09-14 00:25:16 · answer #7 · answered by tantrik 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
In a sense both are terrorists, one rides on camels, donkeys or on foot, the other one flies a high tech Airforce one.
2006-09-13 06:24:44 · answer #8 · answered by miamian 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
As much as I don't like GWB (and didn't vote for him twice) and I'm not so worried about him so much as I am OBL and his suicidal cronies whenever I board a plane
2006-09-13 06:30:02 · answer #9 · answered by samurai_dave 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Too unthinking to even merit a response.
2006-09-13 06:23:52 · answer #10 · answered by mrcricket1932 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋