Of course, you would have to provide proof that you could care for either animal in a humane setting.
2006-09-13 05:34:13 · 6 answers · asked by In Honor of Moja 4 in Social Science ➔ Psychology
No, in response to a question, it would NOT be humane to use these animals for food.
2006-09-13 07:18:33 · update #1
Neither...I know I will not be able to take good care of it. To prevent either both from dying, I will give it to the zoo for their caretaking and provide them with financial need instead.
2006-09-13 05:45:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is it not humane to feed ones family? I would prefer the elephant, it would provide many more meals than the manta ray. Although I believe manta ray would be tastier.
2006-09-13 14:15:18 · answer #2 · answered by Robster01 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, the manta ray would require less food and I think therefore less cost, plus it can kill annoying talk show hosts - so I'll go with the manta ray!
2006-09-13 12:37:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Manta ray -- less crap to clean up; don't have to worry about falling off of a ladder bathing it; doesn't make as much noise.
2006-09-13 12:42:43 · answer #4 · answered by ohio healer 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Elephant. My favorite animal. I would have to adopt it like you do a poor child in a third world country, just send money for it's care. I wouldn't want to take it out of it's natural habitat.
2006-09-13 12:49:42 · answer #5 · answered by Amy P 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would prefer an elephant...my Mum is ossessed with them!
2006-09-13 12:42:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋