2006-09-13 05:32:22 · 17 answers · asked by Hacker 3 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
Gaddafi must've skipped his meds that day. There is no truth to it whatsoever.
2006-09-13 09:32:38 · answer #1 · answered by BoredBookworm 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Whatever that means. Probably it makes Gaddafi feel good and hopeful that the present shame-causing terrorist Islamic sects aren't all Islam can produce. But who cares what Shakespare believed in? He might have worshipped nothing or the gods of the sea... its all his cup of tea.
As for Gaddafi, he may need to see a Psychiatrist. Does he know anyway that Mohammed the founder of Islam was not born a muslim?
2006-09-13 15:38:18 · answer #2 · answered by godwyns 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Um - no.
We don't know much about Shakespeare, but there isn't a shred of evidence connecting him with Islam in any way. Islam has plenty of intellectual superstars as it is (Averroes, Rumi) without pretending that Shakespeare was one of them.
If Shakespeare had any religious allegiance whatsoever it was probably a suppressed leaning towards Catholicism. I don't personally care one way or the other.
2006-09-13 14:08:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just consider how in the world would a 16th-17th Century immigrant hide his background considering the general state of religious intolerance the West lived at the time and you realize it would not be possible.
2006-09-13 05:49:36 · answer #4 · answered by Historygeek 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gadaffi the mad Despot of the Middle East!?! If thats True then Saddam and G.W Bush share the same mother!
2006-09-13 06:25:24 · answer #5 · answered by widgb 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Would he have expressed that in his work? How could anybody know that? Even if it is true, does it mean anything?
Do you know Canada lays claim to having invented the lightbulb, airconditioning, and sliced bread? Does that mean we're really smart? Or does it mean every body likes to rope on to success?
2006-09-13 05:46:37 · answer #6 · answered by thezeus18 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
None whatsoever - Bill's birth, death and marriage are all adequately recorded in Stratford on Avon.
Sheesh.
2006-09-13 07:12:57 · answer #7 · answered by UKJess 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
bothert?! probably wullie was a tube anyway --- peopel in they days never even spoke like tht why did he feel the need?
2006-09-13 05:47:24 · answer #8 · answered by xbrunettes_have_more_funx 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Easy two points there!
(copy & paste) But he's right.
:)
2006-09-13 05:39:50 · answer #9 · answered by ♀ 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did a great curry so i hear
2006-09-13 05:39:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋