You have to understand that Bush doesn't care about anything but money.He sat by while those planes hit and in 5 years goes to the site of the center and puts his foot in his mouth again. He won't admit to any faults , even the faults he knows he has. More fires are started by man than nature and we need those trees for the animals to live in. They can't survive in the spindly ones left after the logging and those trees purify and help fight the pollution Bush creates.Yea, I'm a tree hugger.
2006-09-13 09:16:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by ₦âħí»€G 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
Actualy if you are an alchoholic, and you are able to drink a glass of champagne without giving in to wanting more, then that makes a lot of sence. It is you showing yourself that you have control over what once controlled you.
And here in florida, the Appalachicola Forrest gets Prescribed burns, and has long lines of timber cut down, to keep from forrest fires overwhelming the forrest.
If you keep the underbrush burnt down, then the fire has no where to go but to the tops of the trees, which you can contain, buy cutting down the trees that are lit. The lines are a further protection against said canopy inflamation.
2006-09-13 05:04:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by zack32460 3
·
5⤊
0⤋
i'm thoroughly baffled the form you would be waiting to desire to furnish the Bush administration the marks you in all hazard did, you on the instantaneous are no longer even close to to fact on 9 of the ten. a million. C 2. D 3. F- 4. D 5. D 6. F 7. F 8. F 9. F 10. B
2016-12-15 07:22:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by lindley 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
First: Great news source. No really! They're completely non-biased and I'm sure they don't put any kind of spin on their stories!
Second: Wildfires are a natural occurrence. They happen every year and will get worse and worse without management. Personally, I think they should just be let go, but then you have to remember that 50,000 acres of naturally burning timber and grass puts up A LOT of smoke and air-borne particulates. Too bad you let your blind hatred of Bush get in the way of the truth.
Typical.
2006-09-13 04:58:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by salaamrashaad 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
Wow, there are so many misrepresentations here that who knows where to start. For the folks who want to know what the real initiative is (and cutting down national forests is not part of it) then go to the link below.
2006-09-13 05:50:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by JB 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Oh, brother. Now we're going to start with a new moonbat theory: Bush causes forest fires!
2006-09-13 04:55:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by rustyshackleford001 5
·
4⤊
1⤋
Look at the other side of the coin .Fire Fighting is very dangerous and expensive ,he's saving you Money. Just Kidding....
2006-09-13 05:03:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by Dr.O 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
It's a well-known fact that forests need to be thinned to PREVENT wildfires...Furthermore, wildfires are natural occurrences...
2006-09-13 05:00:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by sacolunga 5
·
4⤊
4⤋
Agreed! This is just another plan for the capitalist to remove the forests for the lumber. Enough said!
2006-09-13 04:55:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by Rita B 3
·
1⤊
6⤋
LOL, good one, what isn't funny is how Duh-bya and his criminal administration are blatanly raping the earth as a means of lining their pockets. Duhbya is an animal and belongs in a zoo.
http://images.search.yahoo.com/search/images/view?back=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.search.yahoo.com%2Fsearch%2Fimages%3Fp%3Dgeorge%2Bw%2Bbush%2Banti%2Benvironment%26ei%3DUTF-8%26fr%3Dush-ans%26x%3Dwrt&w=110&h=141&imgurl=www.uspirg.org%2Fimages%2Fcovers%2Fenviroatriskcover.jpg&rurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.environmentatrisk.org%2Fatrisk.asp%3Fid2%3D7292%26id3%3Datrisk%26&size=6.0kB&name=enviroatriskcover.jpg&p=george+w+bush+anti+environment&type=jpeg&no=12&tt=19&oid=4f1c5199ccbc314c&ei=UTF-8
2006-09-13 05:04:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Dr.Feelgood 5
·
2⤊
4⤋