Hunter/Gatherer-stuff for me. I am an aboriginal Canadian, and as such already have learned basic hunting, trapping and gathering skills. I'm terrible with plants and leafy-type things, and I'm allergic to some fur-bearing animals, so horticultural and pastoral aren't my cup of tea, and early industrial societies had a nasty, nasty little problem with sanitation and saftey conditions, and gave rise to awful epidemics, which I'm also not keen on.
As for my material situation, yeah, I think I would find myself worse off than I am today. I'm a product of the culture that I was raised in, and that culture is highly dependent on rapid developments in technologies. I'd miss all the beautiful music!
2006-09-13 04:31:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by fancybrowneyes 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hunter-Gatherer- People would be more responsible for themselves and also be more important to the society. I'd probably be somewhat worse off materially, but contentment has more importance to me.
2006-09-13 11:19:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by nursesr4evr 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pastoral. I do not consider pastoral material things. I consider it the beauty of the earth.
2006-09-13 11:19:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by makeitright 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
A society where you live simply, grow your own food, have a few friends and enjoy the woods, lakes and surroundings with out having to kill anything.
2006-09-13 11:16:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Anything but early industrial.
Why? I've not experienced it, and would like to.
2006-09-13 11:16:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ana 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
i woul prefer the first option but not hunting and gathering
2006-09-13 11:19:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hunter/gatherer...oh wait! I kind of live that now.
2006-09-13 11:18:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋