English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories
0

I JUST CAME TO KNOW THAT A KASHMIRI CAN BUY A PROPERTY IN ANY PART OF INDIA BUT OTHER INDIANS CAN'T BUY PROPERTY IN KASHMIR EXCEPT KASHMIRIS. I DON'T KNOW IF THIS IS TRUE. BUT IF IT'STRUE WHY IT SHOULD BE LIKE THAT?

2006-09-13 02:45:32 · 4 answers · asked by PARUL Mehta 1 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

4 answers

That would seem to be part of the debate.

"Restrictions on the ownership of real property also may be imposed on citizens of the same state who do not have the right of permanent domicile in the autonomous region." http://www.kashmirstudygroup.net/awayforward/memorandum.html

2006-09-13 02:51:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The independence of the kashmiris was ruined by the Pakistanis who invaded the terrirtory in order to annex it with Pakistan. The muslims there do not yet realize the fate of the Bangala Desis while they wer part of pakistan. some migrant muslims from pakistn are engaged in terrorist activities in order to create s ituation wher the muslims population will become disenchanted withthe government of inida and would work for merger with Pakistan. pakis tan is not for an independetn kashmir . had they been in faour of an independent kashmir they would not have invaded Kashmir at all while it was independent. pakis tan is talkin g about the independence of kshmir with only nefarious intention of invading it once it becomes independent . The kashmiris , some of them blinded by religous affinity fail to undersatnd the design of Pakistan. They would not have the strenght to defend themself=ves from invasion by Pakistan even if they become independent. And remember that the close and bossom friend of Pakistn , the US would be there to help pakistan to annex it as it can have a site to keep watch over the surrounding countries of Asia and Russia . kashmir should not become another Afghanistan under the talibans . It is in the interest of the Kashmiris that they are still with Inida . They are not only safe , but are also enjoying some special sttus at the cost of the Inidian population.
pakistan is constantly on thel ook out to goble it up and its closest ally is ready to help it achieve it , as it can have a strong presence in the area. It will be in the interest of the kshmiris to be with inidia for ever. .It is in the interest and safety of the region also as it is now effectively avoiding the presence of any foreign power in the area.and the conversion of the terrirtoy into another Afghanistan. India is not hoilding on to it because of any greed for territory It is holdin gon to it for the reason that the kashmiris won't be able too save their independence and the invasion of the territory pak will be acertinly and convert the area inot a place of turmoil and head ache for ever to Inida on accoun tof the consequential presence of foreign powers there and the build up of international islamic terrorists camps with the blessings of pakistan and its friend .

2006-09-13 04:05:22 · answer #2 · answered by Infinity 7 · 0 0

I think so. Why such an article was implemented in the constitution is the top secret.

2006-09-13 03:00:25 · answer #3 · answered by indianborntowin 2 · 0 0

It is true because Nehru wanted it that way

2006-09-15 20:35:50 · answer #4 · answered by Brahmanda 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers