Or was the first one good enough to keep the pace they require?
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf
2006-09-13 02:08:52 · 7 answers · asked by mikeygonebad 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It's hard to say what the war mongering neo cons will attempt. I'm thinking they won't, because the public is becoming more and more suspect of the Bush administrations role in 9/11. Have you seen this:
http://www.911pressfortruth.com/news
2006-09-13 02:55:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I am not sure where you have been for the last five years, but there was already a second "Pearl Harbor" which is called September 11, 2001.
What we need, in my honest opinion, is a government that allows for the different political sides to work together, instead of trying to "one up" each other, and trying to prove why the other side is so horrible.
If the different branches of the government and law enforcement agencies had worked together, 9-11 would not have happened, at least not to the extent in which it had occurred.
We do not need a bunch of committees, reports, investigative branches, etc. etc., what we need are politicians (both parties) who are not worried about "one upping" but worry about protecting our country, and making out country stronger.
2006-09-13 09:21:33 · answer #2 · answered by AnAvidViewer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In case you haven't seen this. It does sound a bit familiar.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/pearl/www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/pearl.html
It looks like we need one every 50 years or so, to keep the general population in line and the war machine moving steadily along. I wonder if PNAC's "new pearl harbor" was describing an attack or describing an attack that the government would let happen?
2006-09-13 12:43:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They had their second Pearl Harbor now they need a third.
2006-09-13 09:42:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You do realize that PNAC's goals were simply to strengthen the military and protect the US's interests world-wide, right? And their goals were non-violent? No, I bet you don't. You conspiracy theorists are REALLY grasping at straws!
2006-09-13 09:21:04 · answer #5 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I apologize for my ignorance who r the PNAC?
2006-09-13 09:13:29 · answer #6 · answered by papabeartex 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obviously with the GOP close to losing congress, it was not enough. Keep your eyes open only four to six weeks left....
2006-09-13 09:31:55 · answer #7 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋