English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Must be because it's justified under the "Hate George Bush Doctrine".
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,1871514,00.html

2006-09-13 01:53:26 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

14 answers

I am somewhat liberal, but a I am a proud Christian. I am also very upset with all this killings from both sides. About 70% of Americans nowadays do not agree with Bush and PERHAPS you are among the 30% only. I don't dislike Bush from Irrational and emotional reasons as many people do. I merely don't approve of Bush's foreign policy based on direct facts I can pin point them to you. Bush is single-handedly trying to destroy the separation of powers, and shred the Constitution. So, while I don't approve of Clinton, at least he wasn't an active and direct enemy of the US. How could you have any respect for a president who has no respect for our Constitution, on which this great country was based on? See it for yourself: http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7779.shtml
Also, Bush publicly admitted to felony violations of federal laws (i.e. Warrantless Wiretapping), and these have been confirmed by federal courts, including the Supreme Court. I don't think the Soviets or the Nazis allowed the judges to monitor their domestic spying programs; so why Bush allowed it? It is because the entire illegal warrantless wiretapping program and others were a power ploy to claim executive authority to break the law whenever he wanted. Is that a good behaviour on Bush's part or is it also a propaganda?
As you well know, Bush claimed that God told him to invade Iraq. Is God that careless and clueless and we should stand behind Bush because of such insane rediculous claim?
As many ill informed Americans, who support and sympathize with president in terms of fighting those Muslims Terrorists "Islamo-fascist", they are not being politically correct. This term, which incorrectly and repeatedly used by Bush, means someone who wants to establish an Islamic right-wing authoritarian theocratic dictatorship. A fascist advocates the creation or imposition of a totalitarian form of government, opposed to democracy and anti-liberal. Generally, those terrorists would not fall under that heading, because most muslim terrorists aren't trying to establish a government anywhere anyway. For Bush's info, 99.9% of Muslims are not terrorists. I consider myself a good Christian and I am proud of it. However, I am not on Muslim's side against my country, but I tend to be fair and factual. Bush's Claim that he is a good Christian, is merely a political ploy to gain the majority of the right-wing Christian conservatives. I really wonder if Bush actually won your heart emotionally on this issue!
Speaking of religion, why would Bush support Iraqi PM, Mr. Al-Maliki who is a fanatic Shiat Muslim and who believes that by kissing Ayotallah's hand is a blessing? Not to mention the fact that he supports Hezbollah and Anti-Israel. And lately he makes a deal with Iran to secure Iraq. USA considers Iran as a terrorists sponsor nation. Since Iran is a terrorist country and Al_maliki deals with terrorists and pro hezbollah, does that make Iraq a terrorist nation as well? We invaded Afghanistan because Taliban refused to submit Bin Laden to us. They harbored a terrorist, so Talibans were terrorists as well? So what are we doing in Afghanistan and in Iraq? where is Bin Laden? Ohh, maybe he is somewhere in Europe vacationing, so that Europpean country deserves some nuking too.
It is frustrating to live in a great country like the USA that has in the past had so much to offer and has been known for its open mindedness and open arms to see it beome a place filled with intrique, corruption, war mongering and greed.

Truth, Justice and the American Way is pretty much a fallacy nowadays. It has become Take from the needy and Give to the greedy and if you have something I want, I am going to take it. The Land of Laws has suddenly shown its double standard, the laws for the average working American and the Laws for those that do nothing but take making their livings off the backs of hard working people, not necessarily Americans alone. Finally, Allow me to say that I am proud to be American, but very ashamed of our government, especially Bush's Administration.

2006-09-13 04:55:32 · answer #1 · answered by Mr. J 4 · 0 1

You know you might be right and then you could be wrong, If in case you haven't noticed they are killing each other like a pack of wild dogs. But what is most interesting is that when you look at the whole thing it isn't just about George W. Bush, it is about Muslims having a place in history and a place in normal life and enforcing it (the extremist) on everyone else...Now of course I could be wrong here because I have been wrong before, but this isn't just a liberal thing or a conservative thing this a world thing, Everyone in the world are watching and hoping that the violence stop and that includes you too, that is if you like being known as a warmonger than that is cool.
What I am trying to point out that when you watch the television and you here about Muslims killing a bus load of people or a car bomb going off in a crowded section of people doesn't that make you think more openly what if that would be here in the United States instead of being in Iraq? Sure you can call me and everyone else liberals if you like but on the other side of the coin you are just as concerned as the rest of us, so get off your self proclaimed soap box and come down here like everybody else.

2006-09-13 02:06:48 · answer #2 · answered by beagirl40 4 · 0 0

you're probable taking under consideration the NDAA. No, for liberals it really is concerning, yet a NDAA doesn't trump the structure. we are more beneficial worried with the more beneficial--judicial assassination of human beings although, atypical that you probably did not aspect out that. by the way, the NDAA doesn't communicate to torture. Senator Feinstein did get an modification affirming that the NDAA did not replace the rights individuals electorate. studying the proper sections although, this does no longer influence many US electorate. It actually enables US electorate who're actively operating adversarial to the U. S. as portion of al-Qaeda or the Taliban to be dealt with as a prisoner of warfare. i imagine i visit dodge capturing any US servicemembers, yet i'm more beneficial hectic about thee extrajudicial assassinations.

2016-10-16 00:27:33 · answer #3 · answered by fenn 4 · 0 0

I have no religion in particular and in my opinion, these ******* crazy Muslins are nothing but wild beasts who should have already been exterminated from the face of the earth forever. They don´t have the right to kill anybody for they´re not God. They´re only a group of insane stupid animals that lost their right sense and besides, we´re not living in the Middle Age anymore. Moreover, God has nothing to do with their craziness. That´s it.

2014-12-10 01:25:13 · answer #4 · answered by waldo 1 · 0 0

And this falls under the "Hate All Liberals Doctrine"?

2006-09-13 03:28:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I am a liberal and any torture is wrong. Since we cannot do anything about it except rant and send letters to our elected officials I do not understand
what you expect us to do about it. Tell me, what are the Republicans doing about it besides insulting Liberals?

2006-09-13 02:44:50 · answer #6 · answered by Precious Gem 7 · 1 0

First they hold themselves to a high standard
second you refer to the IRA as wild crazy Christians who kill?

2006-09-13 01:57:19 · answer #7 · answered by Looking ahead 3 · 0 0

I would hope everyone would be upset if anyone is being tortured, but We are Americans and should hold ourselves to a higher standard.

2006-09-13 01:59:52 · answer #8 · answered by I'manalienfrog 5 · 0 0

NO------ Its more like what the fu ck are we doing in Iraq doctrine!

2006-09-13 02:01:00 · answer #9 · answered by worriedaboutyou 4 · 0 0

your reading propaganda as a liberal American I very upset , that people are dieing in the name of God once again

2006-09-13 02:00:39 · answer #10 · answered by learningnewthings 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers