2006-09-13 01:52:00 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Education & Reference ➔ Primary & Secondary Education
I think a lot of what is thaught is more of the truth. There are more options for other forms of schooling out there. And we have all this new technology. So, I would say yes. And how could you wonder? This really is a no-brainer.
2006-09-13 01:58:52 · answer #1 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
an computer engineering quis for u
Q. What is the difference between an Abstract class and Interface?
A. Terms are different ... nothing more
Q. What is JFC ?
A. Jilebi, Fanta & Coffee
Q. Explain 2 tier and 3 -tier Architecture ?
A. Two wheelers like scooters will have 2 tyres and autorickshaws will
have 3 tyres.
Q. I want to store more than 10 objects in a remote server? Which
methodology will follow?
A. Send it through courier.
Q. Can I modify an object in CORBA?
A. As you wish , I do not have any objections.
Q. How to communicate 2 threads each other ?
A. Sorry, Non living things can't communicate.
Q. Explain RMI Architecture?
A. I am a computer professional not an architect student.
Q. What is the use of Servlets ?
A. In hotels, they can replace servers.
Q. What is the dif ference between Process and Threads?
A. Threads are small ropes. Make a rope from threads is an example for
process.
Q. What is JAR file ?
A. File that can be kept inside a jar.
Q. What is JINI?
A. A ghost which was Aladdin's friend.
Q. How will you call an Applet from a _Java Script?
A. I will give invitation.
Q. What is bean ? Where it can be used ?
A. A kind of vegetable. In kitchens for cooking they can be used.
Q. Write down how will you create a binary Tree ?
A. When we sow a binary seed, a binary tree will grow.
2006-09-13 08:53:58 · answer #2 · answered by srini 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Compare Science and Maths 'A' level papers from the early seventies to those of today. Higher standard papers suggest better quality teaching. Teachers and their methods are under the yoke of political correctness that benefits only those who earn money from its implementation and enforcement.
A useful guide to education standards is the entry requirements to a the training programme of a traditional profession:
1960s 'O' Levels
1970s 'A' Levels
1980s Degree
Now The right degree from a good university.
Education standards have been falling since the introduction of comprehensive education. The effect is that students wishing to be educated to a marketable level have to spend considerably longer in education. For those unable to go the distance, the options are not good. Apprenticeships are virtually non-existent, NVQ teaching is to a pathetically low standard and commercial trade courses are very expensive. More fodder for the service industries.
2006-09-13 09:59:32 · answer #3 · answered by Clive 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think truthfully NO! Everyone says Americans are becoming DUMBER! I tend to disagree but in the high school level I think it's hard to reach kids who don't want to learn. Children are different today and it's harder to punish them. Some have no respect for their peers.
The Internet is a resourceful tool which we didn't have it in the 1970's. And yet so many children just plagiarize instead of looking up information. Too me the Internet is the biggest change and the use of it.
2006-09-13 09:31:34 · answer #4 · answered by ????? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm a psychologist. I know that there have been teaching experiments that have impacted how teachers regard students such as favoritism or a sort of self-fulfilling prophecy. I would say in that way at least teaching has been improved since the 70s and 80s.
2006-09-13 08:56:56 · answer #5 · answered by ubiquitousmee 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most of college taught educational research was done in the 1970's and 80's. They are tried and true methods and most teachers still use them; especially in primary education.
2006-09-13 09:07:28 · answer #6 · answered by Ilovechristjesustheking 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think they are more confusing. They have added more steps in basic math now, and it is hard to try to help my children because they are attempting these extra steps and I am showing them how I learned!
I think it is great that they are able to learn computers earlier than we did, but with other basic subjects todays kids have more of a confusion to learn.
2006-09-13 10:52:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
based on being a kid in the 70's and attending school then and what my 8 year old learns...i would say, yes---the methods help more students understand the concepts--however they push younger kids to learn things too early
just for example...my 3rd grader is learning cursive---silly to me...how many people actually use it...and what's more important...how your writing looks or legibility or spelling and grammar?
2006-09-13 09:05:38 · answer #8 · answered by Chef Susy--Cookin it up! 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Modern teaching methods are very lax and do not focus enough on the important things - such as spelling, etc.
2006-09-13 12:20:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, no, and thrice No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
From an angry, bitter and disillusioned teacher (of both secondary and primary) It is all totally fucked in the U.K. Do not send your kids to a state school. Have mercy on them!!!!!! Tell everyone you know who has kids - send them to private schools or ones that are transferring over to the Baccalaureate system. Deal drugs, anything to get the money!!!!!!
2006-09-13 09:28:46 · answer #10 · answered by cobra 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋