English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006420423,00.html

2006-09-13 01:05:38 · 34 answers · asked by http://hogshead.pokerknave.com/ 6 in Entertainment & Music Celebrities

34 answers

Okay so i will be honest (to the detriment of my integrity) and admit to watching Big Brother this time around. As to wether they were a couple or not let me just say that after re-introducing her into the house people who thought the show was totally spontaneous and unmanipulated need their head read. So yes its is possible they werent. Did i care about this fact at the time .... sadly yes.

When you get right down to it i suppose the saddest thing is that life must be really crap if they have to spruce up a reality show (already consisting of hand picked nutters for assured crazy scenes) with direction from outside. Either that or Big Brother has exhausted all the crazies in the UK and we can all sleep soundly now since TV and therefore our lives will return to normal.

2006-09-13 01:16:16 · answer #1 · answered by Lukas D 3 · 2 0

Definately not, it was clear from the start that Pete didn't really like her that way, it was the media stirring it up again. Both of um are idiots, hopefully Nikki will vanish from our screens quickly, I loved the expression on her face when Davina asked Pete, when he came out of the house, how he felt about Nikki and he didn't give a toss,just saying they were friends. She looked like she was going to bawl her eyes out again, talk about humilated.

2006-09-15 02:12:14 · answer #2 · answered by Rainbowz 6 · 1 0

If ever i catch a glimpse of that ranting little headcase, i just want to jump into the tv and give her a good hard slap and tell her to shut the hell up and grow up for the love o' god!!!!!!!!!! There is something really lacking and the bbc should be ashamed for putting her on tv because she blatantly shows signs of being mentally unstable. What on earth does her mother think?!

2006-09-13 01:17:58 · answer #3 · answered by mother knowledge 3 · 0 0

No, I'm not bothered at all but they were on Jonathan Ross's show last Friday and they personally confirmed that they are an item so I think that rules out anything the papers have got to say on the matter.

2006-09-13 01:21:43 · answer #4 · answered by Hotpink555 4 · 1 0

I had to sit through a couple of episodes, to be loyal to my partner. That Nicky is a schemer no mistaking! She would wrinkle her nose up at a guy like pete anyday and everyday. I absolutely could not care less about Big Brother. It must be the most annoying thing on tv. A party political broadcast by the Conservative party would be FAR more interesting viewing.

2006-09-13 01:06:56 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 3

I never gave a monkeys about them to be honest. Big Brother just got too ridiculous and unbelievable laterly. I liked it when Cameron was in it. I think it's all just a publicity stunt with the two of them, and they were quick to realise that they could each make a lot of easy money from it all.

2006-09-13 01:11:44 · answer #6 · answered by . 7 · 3 1

It makes for good reading and makes the papers some money.
I suppose people do give a monkeys as they buy the papers
I just found it funny
I like reading about it as it makes for good entertainment

2006-09-13 01:16:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No. Nobody cared about the whole Pete and Nikki thing. It was so false it turned a lot of viewers off. Big Bro was still good tho. But Aisleyne should have won.

2006-09-13 01:09:16 · answer #8 · answered by Lozzo 3 · 1 4

Of course they were never an item, it's a publicity stunt. No, I don't care.

2006-09-13 04:09:00 · answer #9 · answered by La 7 · 0 0

Omigod, who cares about overrated pathetic BB. It should be axed just like the Australian one.

2006-09-13 01:15:08 · answer #10 · answered by Yoruba 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers