9/11 The Government Did It!?

Question

9/11 was all organized by the US Government! BAD BAD BAD!!!

I heard they did. How do you know they didn't??? If what I hear is wrong could it be that what you hear is wrong also? Be realistic here.

Answer 1

"Bad, Bad, Bad"??? That's it? That's all the thought and effort you're willing to put into this? If you want to be realistic, you should consider the possibility that Santa Clause and the Tooth Fairy were the true masterminds behind 9/11.

Whomever told you about the 9-11/US Gov connection, is someone you should listen to more often. You should rely on this person to form all of your thoughts and opinions, that way you'll never have to think for yourself.

Please question things you hear, before forming your opinion.
Thanks.

Answer 2

No, it's been proven satisfactorily to many of us that practioners of a radical sect of Islam planned and executed the attacks. The correct question is: Was the US govenment complicit in the attacks of 9/11/01? The answer is, unfortunately, yes. Regardless of whatever conspiracy theorists may claim, the facts that the potential for the attacks was ignored by two administrations (Clinton and Bush 43) still paint a dim picture of our political leaders. For those who are willing and able to overcome political blindness, it is clear that both President Clinton and President Bush failed to confront and negate the masterminds of the attack. Hindsight is of course 20/20.

Answer 3

Realistic? Practice what you preach. The government still has a whole in the ground where the trade center stood and couldn't get it together with Katrina either. It would be impossible to pull off by our government without being obviously to blame...which nobody has been able to establish. Too many people would have to be involved and a leak would have come about by now. Live in reality and you be realistic.

Answer 4

It appears that they did.
The government's own conspiracy theory about 19 Arab hijackers is so full of holes that its obviously not true.
So they are trying to hide something.
I therefore guess they did it themselves.

Just for those who are not yet in the know, here's a precis of the government's story.

The biggest conspiracy theory is that 19 Arabs, who had been under surveillance, conspired together, walked onto four commercial aircraft without being detected, and without having their names appear on a passenger list. Then that they could overcome over 250 people with plastic box-cutters. And not only that, but with no previous experience of flying large jets, they could navigate from 30,000 feet and hit three out of four targets precisely, meantime conducting flying manoeuvres that fighter pilots would find difficult. Then, the amazing thing is that 7 of them survived the events and are known to be alive today.
Also for the first time ever in history, three, not two, but three steel framed buildings collapsed as a result of fire which could not possibly have burned hot enough to melt steel, and caused the buildings not to topple over, as one might expect, or to fall a little at a time, but to fall within their own footprint at the speed of gravity. And one of those buildings (WTC7) was not even hit by a plane.
Not only that, but the four aircraft disappeared completely without a trace of their 16 large engines, or any of the black boxes. This has also never before happened in history.


This theory is so amazingly full of holes that it is impossible for any sane thinking person to believe, yet that is what the official 9/11 commission report.says.


"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false."
-- William Casey, CIA Director (from first staff meeting, 1981)

Answer 5

sure. What would bush have finished? countless human beings ***** approximately how bush without difficulty continued reading to a variety of 2nd graders as our united states of america substitute into as quickly as being attacked by terrorists. yet what would desire to he have finished? You tell me. The development substitute into as quickly as going to break down it is not suitable what and interior the time he would have carried out something, the persons in it would were long previous it is not suitable what. have confidence the federal government report thinking the indisputable fact that it does no longer get any precise than that. There are no 3 comments considering they are all twisted and grew to alter into any opposite direction up. the federal government is familiar with of what got here approximately and has reported the persons actual. would they particularly deceive 1000's of hundreds of families that lost kinfolk on how their acquaintances and kinfolk died?

Answer 6

You sound like you are just coming out of the stupor. While I don't believe all of the "theories"--there are definitely some too far out--it is still worth your (the entire world for that matter) effort to keep investigating. Don't let these drooling blowhards stop you from thinking.

Answer 7

If you are American, how dare you be a free thinker! You must believe what the President tells you to believe, or else leave. Dissent is not allowed - it spoils the seamless transition from democratic society to neo-fascist dictatorship.

If you live outside the USA - isn't it great that we don't have to live there? They think it's such a great country - the poor deluded fools.

Answer 8

I dont even know how to react to your statement. And what kind of answer are you looking for? Because you didnt ask anything. So I am going to ask you something. Do you live here in the US? If you do, when are you leaving?

Answer 9

That governments have permitted terrorist acts against their own people, and have even themselves been perpetrators in order to find strategic advantage is quite likely true, but this is the United States we're talking about.

That intelligence agencies, financiers, terrorists and narco-criminals have a long history together is well established, but the Nugan Hand Bank, BCCI, Banco Ambrosiano, the P2 Lodge, the CIA/Mafia anti-Castro/Kennedy alliance, Iran/Contra and the rest were a long time ago, so there’s no need to rehash all that. That was then, this is now!

That Jonathan Bush’s Riggs Bank has been found guilty of laundering terrorist funds and fined a US-record $25 million must embarrass his nephew George, but it's still no justification for leaping to paranoid conclusions.

That George Bush's brother Marvin sat on the board of the Kuwaiti-owned company which provided electronic security to the World Trade Centre, Dulles Airport and United Airlines means nothing more than you must admit those Bush boys have done alright for themselves.

That George Bush found success as a businessman only after the investment of Osama’s brother Salem and reputed al Qaeda financier Khalid bin Mahfouz is just one of those things - one of those crazy things.

That Osama bin Laden is known to have been an asset of US foreign policy in no way implies he still is.

That al Qaeda was active in the Balkan conflict, fighting on the same side as the US as recently as 1999, while the US protected its cells, is merely one of history's little aberrations.

The claims of Michael Springman, State Department veteran of the Jeddah visa bureau, that the CIA ran the office and issued visas to al Qaeda members so they could receive training in the United States, sound like the sour grapes of someone who was fired for making such wild accusations.

That one of George Bush's first acts as President, in January 2001, was to end the two-year deployment of attack submarines which were positioned within striking distance of al Qaeda's Afghanistan camps, even as the group's guilt for the Cole bombing was established, proves that a transition from one administration to the next is never an easy task.

That so many influential figures in and close to the Bush White House had expressed, just a year before the attacks, the need for a "new Pearl Harbor" before their militarist ambitions could be fulfilled, demonstrates nothing more than the accidental virtue of being in the right place at the right time.

That the company PTECH, founded by a Saudi financier placed on America’s Terrorist Watch List in October 2001, had access to the FAA’s entire computer system for two years before the 9/11 attack, means he must not have been such a threat after all.

That whistleblower Indira Singh was told to keep her mouth shut and forget what she learned when she took her concerns about PTECH to her employers and federal authorities, suggests she lacked the big picture. And that the Chief Auditor for JP Morgan Chase told Singh repeatedly, as she answered questions about who supplied her with what information, that "that person should be killed," suggests he should take an anger management seminar.

That on May 8, 2001, Dick Cheney took upon himself the job of co-ordinating a response to domestic terror attacks even as he was crafting the administration’s energy policy which bore implications for America's military, circumventing the established infrastructure and ignoring the recommendations of the Hart-Rudman report, merely shows the VP to be someone who finds it hard to delegate.

That the standing order which covered the shooting down of hijacked aircraft was altered on June 1, 2001, taking discretion away from field commanders and placing it solely in the hands of the Secretary of Defense, is simply poor planning and unfortunate timing. Fortunately the error has been corrected, as the order was rescinded shortly after 9/11.

That in the weeks before 9/11, FBI agent Colleen Rowley found her investigation of Zacarias Moussaoui so perversely thwarted that her colleagues joked that bin Laden had a mole at the FBI, proves the stress-relieving virtue of humour in the workplace.

That Dave Frasca of the FBI’s Radical Fundamentalist Unit received a promotion after quashing multiple, urgent requests for investigations into al Qaeda assets training at flight schools in the summer of 2001 does appear on the surface odd, but undoubtedly there's a good reason for it, quite possibly classified.

That FBI informant Randy Glass, working an undercover sting, was told by Pakistani intelligence operatives that the World Trade Center towers were coming down, and that his repeated warnings which continued until weeks before the attacks, including the mention of planes used as weapons, were ignored by federal authorities, is simply one of the many "What Ifs" of that tragic day.

Answer 10

They couldn't cooperate well enough to come close to organizing something like that...

Go back to chasing Elvis...