English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The real fact of 9/11 are as follows:-
1) Pantagon planned to crash airforce plane and no flight is hijacked. It is proved from the video that after crash blasts started one by one from top to bottom. The whole building was demolished as the buildings are set to demolished by Dinamites step by step. All persons escaaped from there including fire fighters agreed that they have faced explosion and heard explosion various times(fixed by bush and Co.)
2) No body can talk from mobile before 9/11 at that hieght it was impossible at that time and still imossible withoust insatalling speacial devices which was first insatlled after 9/11?
3)Black boxes were found from fire fighters admitted at Fox news and CNn but later on denied by Bush admintration?
4)The plane that was crashed is operated through remote control by air force of USA and the video was planned to record to show the masses to agree them to attack on afghanistan

2006-09-12 23:58:48 · 18 answers · asked by raja pakistani 1 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

18 answers

You are right to think that a conspiracy is behind the 9-11 hijackings. But such an elaborate explanation is not needed. Al Qaeda, a small group of educated and clever militant extremists planned it. They had the expertise, the motivation and the money to do it.

9-11 Commission testimony and first person accounts in several non-fiction books show that the Bush administration was looking for an excuse to invade Iraq; it was on their agenda, but they did not have a politically feasible reason to take down Saddam. Rumsfeld had been taunting Sadaam with flyovers, trying to get him to shoot at US Air Force planes and to violate the no-fly zone in the North of Iraq. Vague warnings of impending terrorist attacks in the US were ignored by the US administration. It was just a matter of time until something happened which could be used to justify significant military action against Iraq.

2006-09-13 00:30:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

I don't understand why it is so hard for you to comprehend that yes, we WERE IN FACT ATTACKED BY TERRORISTS!!!

Even if you are to watch the video when President Bush (who as at a school in Florida) was told about the attacks, his face all of a sudden went flush. It looked as though all the blood had drained from his face. Not even an Academy Award actor could have pulled that off.

Do you really think that the fire fighters and the police would have agreed to something like this? And if every body escaped like you say they did, why did so many die while they were INSIDE the building.

I suggest that you go and tell you theory to a family member of one of the Flight 93 victoms or even a child who lost their father who was trying to save others from the buildings.

Stop wasting your time!!!

2006-09-14 03:32:53 · answer #2 · answered by mccardlec 2 · 1 0

WOW!!

thanks for enlightening us. What a load of crap.

Watch the video. If 'explosions' were heard it could have been the sound of high strength concrete 'exploding' from the excess weight put on it.

The building was not design to withstand so much of the upper stories falling on it.

Think about it. The way it fell was caused by the design of the building. Look it up.

How long do you think is would take to set the explosives. Have you ever looked at the time and effort that goes into blowing a building? They weaken the entire structure. Drill holes in the support frames and place explosives and all kinds of wires. It takes weeks. Wouldn't it have been obvious to the people working there daily that something was up? Come on think for yourself a little.

I could continue but whats the point?

2006-09-13 07:06:37 · answer #3 · answered by bluefalcon_gillis 3 · 1 1

Your overall idea is about right, but many of your facts are distorted.
There were no blasts after the crash at the Pentagon. These blasts were at the twin towers.

It wasn't dynamite, its was thermate or thermite that was used in the controlled demolition of all three demolished WTC buildings.

You are right about the phones.

The planes were not large passenger jets. The Pentagon hit was a missile.

For those really interested in the truth, take a look at the site below, and follow the various links to the detailed research data.
I know the guy who did this work, and he is very keen on the truth. His information has been debated in depth by many truth seekers.

2006-09-13 09:41:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

I think you meant Dynomite... interesting that not one of the 20000 people working in the trade center mentioned seeing anyone drilling holes in the walls (you have to do that when you implode a building).

If you would do some research, I think you'd come to realize that the Trade Center disappearance is actually a David Copperfield illusion and he'll be making the trip to NYon the tenth anniversry to make them reappear.

The capability to operate a cellphone from above 30,000 feet was introduced on Sept 10th 2001, isn;t that a strange coincidence. Really, it's true.

Oh, before I forget...they took the word gullible out of the dictionary... seriously, look it up.

2006-09-13 07:28:47 · answer #5 · answered by Bake 2 · 4 0

Oh brother. What a bunch of bull crap! You know, for a few days, unfortunately, I started to fall for this load of bull, before I let common sense, what I SAW for REALS when 9/11 happened, personal people and friends I KNOW that were there when all of this happened, reaffirmed what I already knew.
WE WERE ATTACKED BY TERRORISTS!
You must be one trying to brain wash the dummies in this country into believing that is was Pres Bush, and others. That's RIDICULOUS.
Anyway, you got lots of stuff confused and mixed up in what you wrote about. You blended the Pentagon with the Trade Center buildings as if it was one "explosion" in one place.
By the way, BLACK BOXES ARE FROM PLANES, silly boy! Not bombs!!

2006-09-13 07:03:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

Ok. This is the truth as far as I can tell. There were two buildings in New York, planes crashed into them and fell down. A plane crashed into the pentigon (I think, I don't think a plane was found there) and a field in Pennsylvania. That's the truth, the rest is only speculation.

2006-09-13 07:01:20 · answer #7 · answered by mindrizzle 3 · 3 2

Anyone who believes such nonsense is madder than Mad Jack McMad, winner of last years Mr Mad competition. Where is the evidence for your spurious claims? Your motivation for denying this appalling act of terrorism is part of the problem. For sure, the vast majority of Muslims are good and decent people, but those who commit these and other acts of terror are evil and so are those who make excuses for them or lies, like the above, for them

2006-09-13 07:12:38 · answer #8 · answered by phoneypersona 5 · 1 1

I gotta real fact for you!
The people on those planes were real....FACT!
The relatives of those people who feel the loss of those people are real...FACT!
You don't even have enough love or belief in your own way of life to acknowledge your so called martyrs were the ones that highjacked the planes....FACT
I guess i'm not really suprised,you are pathetic, and you are a bunch of cowards...FACT!

2006-09-13 09:00:43 · answer #9 · answered by Dave 3 · 2 0

You would think that on this fifth anniversary of 9/11 people would let-up on these unsupported conspiracy theories. How they happened, who did it, why they did it, is all known.

None of these conspiracy theories are supported by any facts. Supporting them and promoting them is simply aiding and abetting the terrorists who attacked the United States.

2006-09-13 07:10:39 · answer #10 · answered by Randy 7 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers