Political corruption and a lack of an organized system of transferring political power (basically, one became emperor by assassinating the previous emperor). This led to continued chaos and really spotty leadership (some brilliant, some idiotic, some mad as hatters).
Also, attacks from nomadic peoples displaced by the Mongol Empire into moving into Europe, stressed the politically weakened empire. A population explosion was making the empire's territory very attractive to the steppe people.
That, combined with a growing cynicism in the middle class that led to generally corrupt economics (debased currency, piracy, and other forms of cheating), helped hasten the downfall of the Empire after five or six centuries.
2006-09-12 23:26:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Grendle 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
some factors contributed. of direction there are countless extra, yet those are the biggest, and maximum needed ones: Over boost - they'd no longer administration their borders. (particularly Germany). This outcomes interior the 2d element. Declining protection tension power - The Roman protection tension became into overstretched, and in simple terms approximately everywhere it became into engaged, it became into struggling with a guerrilla conflict. in reality, the Visigoths actual sacked Rome in 410 earlier the Empire fell. susceptible management - by the time of the fall of the Empire, the management of Rome have been tactically inept, apathetic to his place, stupid, or a blend of the three for rather a while. in spite of the undeniable fact that, it is considerable undergo in suggestions that Rome did no longer thoroughly fall. The eastern Roman Empire, or the Byzantine Empire, survived for over one thousand years after the fall down of the Western Empire, and became right into a considerable participant even into the middle a protracted time. (They led to the Crusades)
2016-12-12 07:37:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Every Empire falls at the end. But the reason was officers fighting each other and influance of the nations which lived north of the Roman Empire: Some of them became romen citizens, but then their decendents were not loyal to the Roman Empire.
2006-09-13 00:02:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
There was a gradual decline in the empire's strength over it's last 400 years as an empire. Rome lasted approx from 400BC to 400 ad,, that's 800 years my friends. I'm not going to be able to answer it here, but 600 page books have been written on the subject of just the decline and fall. from what I've gathered in my sparse reading,, it was a move away from the single landed farmer, which gave Rome it's initial strength, to a corporate slave farming, with the disenfranchisement of the common roman citizen that was at the root of the decay. Several emperors tried unsuccessfully to stem the tide of the wealth moving to the few, which led to the internal weakening of the strength of Rome. Also if you read the history of Rome, I would say it's greatest pass time- War, which greatly,, or I should say Hugely, enriched it,, also depleted it's available troop strength, and contributed to it's demise.
2006-09-12 23:31:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Refer to the following link:
2006-09-13 04:31:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by lambert_fan1967 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The western empire fell from over expansion, internal corruption, and the replacement of their legions with mostly mercenary troops. Rome was also plagued with repeated invasions from various Germanic tribes from the north such as the as the Visigoths and Ostrogoth's who exploited the empires weakened condition. Also the splitting of the empire itself to the western and eastern branches may have contributeed to the collapse.
2006-09-12 23:33:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by Parisha 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
empires - even men - do not "fall" for simple single reasons. yes, rome spread its power too thin. it became decadent. its policy of adopting conquered countries' behaviours and religions caused a certain lack of cohesion. some scholars believe that the pipes bringing water to the romans, being constructed of lead, caused lead poisoning, and much of rome went insane, leading to its demise. there is no one answer.
one source: http://killeenroos.com/1/Romefall.htm
2006-09-12 23:40:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by altgrave 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
oh so many reasons....
being over-stretched and facing attack the east when they were still trying to get into britain,
a severly over indulgent society.
the senate and imerical family not seeing eye to eye on anything
crazed power mad emperors, nero for instance.
and although i may get abused for this, forcing the roman people to convert to christianity, changing all their different gods for the one.
but if i had to choose one i'd say being over-stretched, this along with political infighting and power struggles made the empire implode and destroy itself.
2006-09-12 23:28:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by moominboy1982 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
din cauza luptelor interne intre generali si armatele lor care atacau roma spre a se instala drept imparati, din cauza faptului ca se extinsese teritorial mult prea mult, mult prea repede si granitele nu puteau fii pazite ; de unde barbarii puteau patrunde usor in imperiu, si di cauza faptului ca roma avea un ''talent'' spre a ataca orice dusmani, reali sau fictivi; si asta seca imperiul de bani- un razboi( nu mai vb ca roma purta raz. peste tot) costa enorm pe toata lumea implicata
2006-09-13 05:41:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by oana 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
some historians say supply and demand
Such a wide spread empire was hard to supply wages weapons
soldiers etc
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/roman_empire
the decline
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/decline_of_the_roman_empire
the decline and fall
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/the_history_of_the_decline_and_fall_of_the_roman_empire
hope this helps don't forget the links on the wiki page
2006-09-12 23:34:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by Eric C 4
·
0⤊
1⤋