Bush is an evil man because he is responsible for 130,000+ Iraqi civilian lives. I say this because I believe the leader of a nation that invades another nation for no reason, is the one responsible from that point for civilian casualties.
When Saddam invaded Kuwait but he actually had more reason than Bush did for invading Iraq. I won't go into the details but basically Kuwait had refused to stop stealing their oil by tapping into oil lines that ran underground across their border and into Iraq.
I do believe Saddam was also an evil tyrant but I am saying that Bush is worse. Any president that hides behinds lies like "they hate us because they hate freedom" or "we are at war with Islamic fascists" is a false Christian and a flat out liar.
Bush is purposely lieing to the ppl of the world and what makes it so bad is that he KNOWS this stuff isn't true. He says those things to make us hate Islam because he does.
2006-09-12 19:59:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by BeachBum 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
You see when Iraq not attacked Saddam was a bad man.He killed his opponents for noreason except that they were not loyal to him he thought.He killed his own son-in-law treachrously. he killed Shias inthousands and Kurds in millions. He was ruthlwss.He attacked Kuwait for no reasons except that he fell in a trap laid by American CIA.He had not allow decracy to take root.He was aninsane dictator.He was not agood man.
On the other hand Bush, became asbad as Saddam as soon as he put his feet in Saddam's shoes.He attacked Iraq on false pretext.He killed thousands and injured millions.His father spared Saddam for his son to cash on him. he did exacly what senior left for him,only in the most wrong way. there is no way to continue killing people ,at times, get killed too.An un ending copaign on TERRORISM which will produce no results. It will only breed more terrorism.The only way to reslve any issue is to come to dialogue. Listen to other party's view also.After all problem of Vietnam was also solved through negotiations. why can't we talk to whosoever is acting as terror. Bush's obstinscy and arrogance shall also sink America There is still time to think.So after Saddam's removal from power Bush has become evil.
2006-09-13 03:28:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by riaz 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's like asking: "Is it better to die from drowning or from hanging?"
Saddam is as evil as Bush. It is hard to see the distinction. Saddam killed Iraqis, Bush kills Iraqis. Saddam was greedy, Bush is greedy. They are the same with slightly different "taste".
Both certainly deserve to be tried and sentenced, because both are guilty.
2006-09-13 03:03:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by The answer man 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I do not support either one but if I was forced to back one of them it would be Bush I just think he used the wrong reason and went to war at the wrong time and now I think we need to stay the course and complete the mission and the worst part of this is that means lots more Americans losing there lives but if we leave now are people will be safe but the world will turn there backs on us if we are ever in need
2006-09-13 03:04:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by Glen M 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Saddam bad, Bush good.
2006-09-13 02:54:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by MorgantonNC 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Bush is the warmonger,, saddam was bad,, but.. he was kind of like hitler he wanted the power and control of people.. not weopons of mass destruction.... as BUSH claims,,bush says stay THE COURSE, I say GET out while the gettins good. Before the freaks cut loose on on the soldiers that are in IRAQ. and they will ,once they realize a cival war is in effect,. then they will not be able to save our neighbours. and I AM CANADIAN..
2006-09-13 02:49:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by rakisup 2
·
0⤊
3⤋
Saddam Hussain is a killer for gaining power. Bush is a killer for the sake of protecting American interests. Both are killers but Bush is justified for what he is doing.
2006-09-13 02:35:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by sunilbernard 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
oh, ok. a man who started a war with two of his neighbors. killed 300,000 of his own people, not to mention the atrocities committed against women and a few other personality flaws.....whatever!
yeah, saddam is just a good ol boy, innit he?
dumb question.
2006-09-13 02:35:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by afterflakes 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Both were living human kind who made blunders and slip-ups with human errors on planet earth.
Both got kick on the butts by little children on planet earth.
Try and get hold of Peter Arnett two newsreels on documentary of Iraq with National Geographic.
Observe closely and listen how poor old Saddam got himself kicked on the butts by little children in his own backyards on planet earth.
The blunders and slip-ups with human errors got himself sold to the highest bidder in the barter's market for thirty pieces of silver with the betrayal of Judas one of the dirty dozen on planet earth.
Do we understand those picture from the court case that prove his innocence on planet earth.
Do we see the three men in the tub who rub-a-dub-dub washing their hands on planet earth.
2006-09-13 03:03:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
They are BOTH great guys, we are all going to go out for drinks this friday then invade some country for shiits and giggles
2006-09-13 03:15:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋