Both, in a way, but you are the adult here and you should teach your child not to judge people for the way they look.
Both Christina and Britney had good songs in the beginning and they looked... normal. Try buying your kid their first albums ("Christina Aguilera" and "... Baby one more time", both released in 1999) as a gift.
2006-09-12 23:19:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by songbird 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Britney for sure. Christina keeps to herself more than Britney does and has less incidents of publicly humiliating behaviors.
2006-09-13 02:24:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by B.J. H 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Britney, by far. Christina used to be bad, too, but she's cleaned up a lot. Britney's gotten much, much worse.
2006-09-13 02:34:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by Discotheque 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Brittany Murphy.
2006-09-13 02:23:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Arts 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Brittney all the way..she's a bad role model for young kids and teenagers
2006-09-13 02:24:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ultimate Diva 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
Wow what a choice I think that one is a tie between them 2! I wont let my 10 year old listen to either of them!
2006-09-13 02:30:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by stormy2u2001 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Britney ....christina seems to have cleaned up her act a bit...
2006-09-13 02:30:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Britney, hands down, shirts off, wins by a mile.
2006-09-13 02:29:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by ralph w 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
can't really say. they're both clones of one another but i think britney came out first. quick, hide your 8 yr old's cd collection before you have a child dancing to songs with absolutely no meaning. why would you let a 8 yr old listen to lyrics like "i'm dirrty" anyway?? no offence, but really...
2006-09-13 02:29:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
britney. at least christina can sing.
2006-09-13 04:18:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by Abby 3
·
0⤊
0⤋