2006-09-12 18:52:51 · 23 answers · asked by football crazy 2 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Its pretty tough by I would say the raiders. Sure people wanna blame Brooks but its their lines which are the problem. Not even a pro bowl quaterback couldve been expected to have a decent game the way the chargers were able to get to Brooks. At the rate their getting to him he'll probally get killed! On the other side the d-line allows too many rushing yards and dont put pressure on a qb on a consistent basis.
2006-09-13 02:34:39 · answer #1 · answered by Luigi 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's close, but I'd have to say the Raiders are worse.
The Packers' defense actually played respectably against the Bears, holding them to 4-for-14 on third downs, which resulted in four FGs. The Packer D only gave up one offensive TD (the Bears' other TD came on a punt return).
The Packers' offense at least gained some respectable yardage. And while the D held the Bears' rushing game to 109 yards, Ahman Green had 110 on his own.
The Raiders couldn't move the ball and supplemented that with an inability to stop the ball. They were thoroughly bad, died-in-the-wool crappy.
2006-09-13 03:09:43 · answer #2 · answered by Lawn Jockey 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Packers with Farve are worse; the Raiders beat themselves on Monday. I think the Raiders will have a better season in the main. They have a great coach.
2006-09-12 23:20:33 · answer #3 · answered by soxrcat 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Raiders. They are not only bad but are in much worse shape than Green Bay going into the rest of the season.
2006-09-12 18:55:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Green Bay Packers are horrible. The Raiders will bench Brooks if he doesn't get it together, Farve can throw 5 interceptions a game and he still won't be benched.
2006-09-12 20:51:28 · answer #5 · answered by WestCoastin4Life 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the Green Bay Packers, Brett Favre really does need to retire. they are so desperate they sign a troubled wide receiver that will continue to be troubled. Make no mistake about it, the Raiders have the talent but are screwed by a terrible regime.
2006-09-12 19:47:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Packers
2006-09-13 05:20:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Packers
2006-09-13 00:08:13 · answer #8 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Raiders, the Packers (who I have always hated) at least have what used to be a #1qb. On his worst day Farvre is better than Brooks.
2006-09-13 01:11:37 · answer #9 · answered by stan l 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oakland Raiders. They really suck. I saw the game on monday, and they got their butts kicked so badly. Only 46 yards in the first half. that is embarassing.
2006-09-12 19:00:28 · answer #10 · answered by confused1832 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋