English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-09-12 18:49:50 · 14 answers · asked by Ned B 1 in Politics & Government Politics

The enemies existed way before Bush. He just chose to fight them. Clinton was gutless.

2006-09-12 18:54:26 · update #1

14 answers

We might get a terroist nuke here. After that the middle East will be blown off the map. Hiroshima here we come.

2006-09-12 19:00:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

It's a scary question you're asking. It could be any of them or someone we're not aware of even yet. If I had to pick, I think Iran, they are backed by Russia and Korea. However, I don't think things are that dire. There's a good Chance it wont happen at all. Think about it, most countries have lots of monies invested in the US. They're not going to loose those assets. It wont be China, they'll just kill us economically. That is their plan. Beat us at our own game. They've already set off their Nuke, its called the trade deficit.

2006-09-12 18:58:38 · answer #2 · answered by rgbear38 2 · 0 0

not gonna ensue. There are defenses to maintain a missle from achieving the U.S, (your tax money are going someplace different than politicians wallet you recognize). and nonetheless, except they're loopy, those natiosn are nicely conscious that if a nuke is released on the U.S, it quite is in certainty signing a loss of life warrant because it provides the united statesloose reign to cut back Iran/N Korea right into a smouldering radioactive crater.

2016-10-14 23:00:06 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Lets see North Korean does not have a missile that can reach the US. Iran does not have Nukes yet. Russia is smarter than that
and they don't have beef with us like that. I think people are naive when the talk about us nuking this country and that country. Nuclear war would end civilization as we know it.

2006-09-12 19:02:31 · answer #4 · answered by Bigboi47 3 · 0 0

Considering the president's family history to make money no matter how immoral it is I would say we'll sell the nukes to our enemies ourselves. We've certainly armed them in the past.

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/10_09_01_carlyle.html

Money corrupts.

The best way we can stop anything like this from happening is to open up to public view all secret deals our government makes with dictators and dictator wannabes. We armed Osama, Saddam and Hitler. We even helped arm the Japanese. All because of pure American greed.

2006-09-12 19:13:00 · answer #5 · answered by Doc Watson 7 · 0 0

The Canadians first, and they'll buy all those nukes with their Internet gambling money!!! Then the penguins - you think Antarctica is okay with being the 7th continent forever?? That can only last for so long, before they snap!

2006-09-12 18:53:43 · answer #6 · answered by Singletary 2 · 2 0

Where exactly is the United "sates" that you speak of?

Me thinks Ned needs a nap..

. .

2006-09-12 18:53:26 · answer #7 · answered by HockeyGirl 3 · 2 0

Yes, Clinton along with his hag of a wife is/was gutless. To answer your question I think all three are dangerous. But I say if one nuke sails towards us China along with NORAD better send some intercepting missles cause if we go up in smoke so does their economy!!!

2006-09-12 19:01:29 · answer #8 · answered by dillenger 2 · 0 4

It doesn't matter, as you as YOU are far enough away from the blast to die slowly of radiation poisoning. Have a nice day, Sunshine.

2006-09-12 19:04:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Russia. The most downplayed threat to America in the 21st century.

2006-09-12 19:36:08 · answer #10 · answered by Mr. Bojangles 5 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers