It will end fatally. Politicians purpose is to conflict not unite. i don't think politicians will ever see past prejudging others for being of the other side.
2006-09-12 17:59:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by knightashen 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I'm with the Major. Our President needs to quit listening to the politically correct, whining liberal douchebags and lauch an all out effort; we need to create the Middle Eastern Ocean. At the very least, the Eastern Great Salt Lake. Once that threat is extinguished in its entirety, there can be a lasting peace.
2006-09-12 18:01:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
i will say no. Bush (a Conservative) has been tearing down u . s . because the day he entered place of work. He all started an unlawful warfare. Invaded a sovereign u . s . a . that did not attack us. or perhaps even as his human beings stated it develop into time for substitute, he saved direction. it really is why we elected Democrats. they have in basic terms been in place of work 7 months, and function finished more effective than the previous Republican Congress did contained in the previous 12 years. yet substitute won't be able to come like the human beings like it even as the President vetoes each and every thing. save in concepts, there have been 4 Iraq expenditures. 4. 3 were shot down, and one develop into licensed. save in concepts, he's now on a funds. something that develop into completely unprecedented in the course of the Republican Congress. understand that he now has to deliver progression comments to Congress. comments that're more effective than only a "we are making progression". something else that develop into unprecedented. and finally, Iraq now has benchmarks. not in basic terms that, yet they raised the minimum salary and are engaged on Immigration reform in the present day. And it really is all interior 7 months. i might want to ought to assert that Conservatives (mainly Bush) is the reason we are in each and every of the mess we are in.
2016-11-26 20:47:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by sangster 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Do you think giving up your rights is the "right " thing to do?
That is a fatal idea ! I would like to keep my rights, instead of a little false security.
Think about it, our focus is diverted, now they can do their little dirty deals be hind our backs.
The terrorist (or government) has already won they don't needed to attack again. The people are so damn scared of this BS the media feeds us every day. That people are willing to let the power hungry s.o.b's. take over their lives.
2006-09-12 18:09:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by ol9_hippie 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
well, I think that those currently in government really have dropped the ball overall... Osama is still out there and 9-11 is all you need to know that he's a threat...
yet we let Pakistan and a few U.S. troops look for him?
what does he have to do before he gets the attention that Saddam got? we send 100,000 to get Saddam and only 20,000 to get Osama? and then we won't let them go into the country (Pakistan) that he is probably in?
it's time that we took Osama as seriously as 9-11 warranted... the deaths of 3,000 U.S. citizens deserves justice....
2006-09-12 18:01:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Any death is a death in vain. Any lie is a lie all the same. To divert the truth. Is to see democracy uproot. To try to expand freedom without just cause. Is just freedom waiting to end the pause. Someone will see too many die. Maybe it's best not to be advised.
2006-09-12 17:58:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by Thin King 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
We all need to stop whining and start kicking some serious ***. Look at Israel. Let's just pave the middle east in nuclear glass.
2006-09-12 17:57:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by Major Toescurl 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes, the bickering is fatal. But so is ignoring both of those problems.
2006-09-12 17:56:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe it is time that the US folds and divides into regional nation states.
2006-09-12 17:55:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
You are right...perhaps if we told Bush that Bin Laden was a liberal, he'd get serious about finding him.
2006-09-12 18:05:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by KERMIT M 6
·
0⤊
1⤋