Clinton has sense taken out of docudrama. Is this fare?

Question

ABC tinkers with 9/11 TV drama assailed by Clinton

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Under pressure from former President Bill Clinton and the Democratic Party, ABC scrambled on Friday to make 11th-hour changes to a miniseries suggesting he was inattentive to the Islamic militant threat that led to the September 11 attacks.


Several sense from the TV docudrama that show President Clinton having a chance to get Osama but was distracted by his Monica Lewnski case. He has censored TV shows before such as an SNL skit about his daughter Chelsea. Is this Liberal slant of the Media Censorship?

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/09092006/6/n-usa-abc-tinkers-9-11-tv-drama-assailed-clinton.html

Answer 1

It just shows how communistic the Clinton's and democrats/liberals really are. Covering up facts replaced by lies or just taking out the facts, because it will make them look bad and ruin them and their corrupt political power! Where were the people that always complain about their free speech rights under the first amendment? The complained when christians wanted a artshow to remove a "art" piece showing the crucifix in a bottle of urine. Those liberals said we have the first amendment right of free speech to show this. But where were they when the free speech of facts and the free speech that made a ex-President look bad so he threatened the liberal owner of ABC to change and edit parts of the docudrama! Where were they! No where at all to be found! If there was ever a sign of Clinton's and most liberals being communistic, this is it!

Yes though it was true if you look back on it, Clinton had many chances to catch Bin Laden. He said we have no "proof" no proof after the February of 1993 WTC towers getting bombed by suicide bombers sent by Bin Laden? Right there should have been proof enough to fight back, fight back before the 4 other attacks took place under his administration! But no, it took 9/11 to finally fight back, to fight back under another President, because the liberals are too afraid to fight back. They would rather talk peace to the very people that strap bombs on their children, that behead our and other countries military or civilians that are against them heads off.

If Republicans weren't so gung ho about impeaching him about getting some from some dumb intern. Maybe instead they could have shifted focus on the attacks that were taking place. And from there show how he was neglecting the country and letting the United States and other terroritory such as US embassies being attacked by Bin Laden and his suicide bombers and killers.

Funny how free speech is argued when liberals are getting something of theirs censored or taken away. In fact Clinton did much more harm by even bringing the docudrama up in the first place. Bringing it up it shows the facts about his failing to protect America, showing the facts of how horrible a President he was. Most of all, showing how he failed to ever fight back even after having 5 attacks and many chances to catch Bin Laden. Like always he ended up screwing himself over by opening his mouth and getting in public eye. That liberal sick minded Nazi communist! Where was their free speech rights to show the movie unedited!

Answer 2

Nope. Her activity approval is often above around 60% at the instant, so she does some thing surprising. bill continues to be favourite - he left the White abode with acceptance levels above 60% and continues to be distinctly commonly used and respected anyplace he is going. teach me a source that shows she's no longer taken heavily? till you mean North Korea, it is a crack-pot place that's by no ability gonna fall on the feet of the U. S. or the different western united states of america besides.

Answer 3

The Liberal Media is attempting to control America by brainwashing the American people into believing what they report. This is further proof they are attempting to destroy America and rip our moral fabric apart, by dividing us as Liberals and Conservatives. Bin Laden even issued that edict as part of his plan. People are refusing to listen and believe.

To quote South Park "death estimates in this town of 60,000 people are approaching 500 million. No, we have no proof, but this is what we are reporting."

Answer 4

I think your question is whether it is "FAIR"? Yes, if the film claim to be partially documentary - then it is right to request that it be fairly portrayed. It has nothing to do with it being a Liberal slant. Michael Moore researched all of his facts in the DOCUMENTARY "Fahrenheit 9/11", doesn't this need to be held to the same standard? "Fahrenheit 9/11" was in a theatrical release and if you didn't agree with it you didn't need to go to the theater and pay to see it. "Path to 9-11" was on public television and thus you had no choice - it was on television whether you agreed with it or not.

Answer 5

He objected to parts of the script which is said were not true. The network edited some of those scenes

Answer 6

Whatever ones views, it would be negative to Hillary.